The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of China's Grain for Green Project on the landscape of vulnerable arid and semi‐arid agricultural regions: a case study in northern Shaanxi Province
Abstract
Summary: China's Grain for Green Project is a rapid landscape‐scale shift in ground cover and land use with significant implications for biodiversity. From 1998 to 2005, we carried out field studies to examine the landscape‐level impacts of this project, and to provide a practical example of the successes and failures of a large‐scale attempt to restore a vulnerable environment. In a northern part of China's Shaanxi Province, our results indicated that the total vegetation cover in areas covered by this project increased from 29·7% in 1998 to 42·2% in 2005. However, we also found evidence that large‐scale afforestation in this vulnerable arid and semi‐arid region could increase the severity of water shortages, decrease vegetation cover in afforestation plots, and adversely affect the number of species present. The exclusion of livestock from overgrazed areas and the elimination of cultivation in marginal areas had the biggest effects on the restoration of vegetation cover, whereas tree planting had a strong negative effect in vulnerable areas. Synthesis and applications. In practical terms, the destruction of natural vegetation cover during afforestation should be avoided, as this makes the soil surface more vulnerable to erosion and reduces species diversity. Managers should reduce the intensity of farming and grazing on fragile land rather than relying on afforestation as the primary tool for ecological restoration in arid and semi‐arid areas. Afforestation remains a valuable tool but should be limited to the planting of native or other species that will not exacerbate soil water shortages such as stable communities of natural desert steppe, maximum water‐use efficiency dwarf shrubs, and possibly even lichen species in more severely degraded environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
China’s environment in a globalizing world
Liu, J., & Diamond, J. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/4351179a · Cited by 1,643
Ecosystem carbon loss with woody plant invasion of grasslands.
Jackson, R. B., Banner, J. L., Jobbágy, E. G., Pockman, W. T., & Wall, D. H. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00910 · Cited by 1,007
How extinction patterns affect ecosystems
Raffaelli, D. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1106365 · Cited by 154
Cited by
SOIL EROSION, CONSERVATION, AND ECO‐ENVIRONMENT CHANGES IN THE LOESS PLATEAU OF CHINA
Zhao, G., Mu, X., Wen, Z., Wang, F., & Gao, P. (2013) · Land Degradation & Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.2246 · Cited by 1,049
Soil moisture decline due to afforestation across the Loess Plateau, China
Jia, X., Shao, M., Zhu, Y., & Luo, Y. (2017) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.01.011 · Cited by 759
Mi, J., Liu, W., Yang, W., Yan, J., Li, J., & Sang, T. (2014) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.07.047 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Cao, S., Chen, L., & Yu, X.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-04-28
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 536-543
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W2082834424
- Cited by
- 486
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of China's Grain for Green Project on the landscape of vulnerable arid and semi‐arid agricultural regions: a case study in northern Shaanxi Province. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01605.x
- The paper
- Cao, S., Chen, L., & Yu, X. (2009). Impact of China's Grain for Green Project on the landscape of vulnerable arid and semi‐arid agricultural regions: a case study in northern Shaanxi Province. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01605.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.