The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Climate change, connectivity and conservation decision making: back to basics
Open accessAbstract
Summary: 1. The challenge of climate change forces us to re‐examine the assumptions underlying conservation planning. 2. Increasing ‘connectivity’ has emerged as the most favoured option for conservation in the face of climate change. 3. We argue that the importance of connectivity is being overemphasized: quantifying the benefits of connectivity per se is plagued with uncertainty, and connectivity can be co‐incidentally improved by targeting more concrete metrics: habitat area and habitat quality. 4. Synthesis and applications . Before investing in connectivity projects, conservation practitioners should analyse the benefits expected to arise from increasing connectivity and compare them with alternative investments, to ensure as much biodiversity conservation and resilience to climate change as possible within their budget. Strategies that we expect to remain robust in the face of climate change include maintaining and increasing the area of high quality habitats, prioritizing areas that have high environmental heterogeneity and controlling other anthropogenic threatening processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecological and Evolutionary Responses to Recent Climate Change
Parmesan, C. (2006) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100 · Cited by 8,652
The statistics and biology of the species-area relationship
Connor, E. F., & McCoy, E. D. (1979) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283438 · Cited by 2,313
Cited by
Projected range contractions of montane biodiversity under global warming
La Sorte, F. A., & Jetz, W. (2010) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0612 · Cited by 444
Vulnerability of biodiversity hotspots to global change
Bellard, C., Leclerc, C., Leroy, B., Bakkenes, M., Veloz, S., Thuiller, W., & Courchamp, F. (2014) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/geb.12228 · Cited by 441
Thomas, C. D. (2011) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.02.006 · Cited by 411
Self-citationGalpern, P., Manseau, M., & Fall, A. (2011) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.09.002 · Cited by 318
Incorporating climate change into systematic conservation planning
Groves, C. R., Game, E. T., Anderson, M. G., Cross, M., Enquist, C., Ferdaña, Z., Girvetz, E., Gondor, A., Hall, K. R., Higgins, J., et al. (2012) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-012-0269-3 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Hodgson, J. A., Thomas, C. D., Wintle, B. A., & Moilanen, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 964-969
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W2013932208
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 29.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Climate change, connectivity and conservation decision making: back to basics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01695.x
- The paper
- Hodgson, J. A., Thomas, C. D., Wintle, B. A., & Moilanen, A. (2009). Climate change, connectivity and conservation decision making: back to basics. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01695.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.