The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size
Open accessAbstract
Summary: 1. Distance sampling is a widely used technique for estimating the size or density of biological populations. Many distance sampling designs and most analyses use the software Distance. 2. We briefly review distance sampling and its assumptions, outline the history, structure and capabilities of Distance, and provide hints on its use. 3. Good survey design is a crucial prerequisite for obtaining reliable results. Distance has a survey design engine, with a built‐in geographic information system, that allows properties of different proposed designs to be examined via simulation, and survey plans to be generated. 4. A first step in analysis of distance sampling data is modelling the probability of detection. Distance contains three increasingly sophisticated analysis engines for this: conventional distance sampling, which models detection probability as a function of distance from the transect and assumes all objects at zero distance are detected; multiple‐covariate distance sampling, which allows covariates in addition to distance; and mark–recapture distance sampling, which relaxes the assumption of certain detection at zero distance. 5. All three engines allow estimation of density or abundance, stratified if required, with associated measures of precision calculated either analytically or via the bootstrap. 6. Advanced analysis topics covered include the use of multipliers to allow analysis of indirect surveys (such as dung or nest surveys), the density surface modelling analysis engine for spatial and habitat modelling, and information about accessing the analysis engines directly from other software. 7.Synthesis and applications. Distance sampling is a key method for producing abundance and density estimates in challenging field conditions. The theory underlying the methods continues to expand to cope with realistic estimation situations. In step with theoretical developments, state‐of‐the‐art software that implements these methods is described that makes the methods accessible to practising ecologists.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R
Wood, S. N. (2017) · doi:10.1201/9781315370279 · Cited by 13,852
Bootstrap Methods and their Application
Davison, A. C., & Hinkley, D. V. (1997) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802843 · Cited by 7,350
Wood, S. N. (2006) · doi:10.1201/9781420010404 · Cited by 4,953
Cited by
Accounting for Imperfect Detection in Ecology: A Quantitative Review
Kellner, K. F., & Swihart, R. K. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111436 · Cited by 383
Contrasting Diversity Values: Statistical Inferences Based on Overlapping Confidence Intervals
MacGregor-Fors, I., & Payton, M. E. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056794 · Cited by 342
Quantifying the sensitivity of camera traps: an adapted distance sampling approach
Marcus Rowcliffe, J., Carbone, C., Jansen, P. A., Kays, R., & Kranstauber, B. (2011) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00094.x · Cited by 294
Distance sampling with camera traps
Howe, E. J., Buckland, S. T., Després‐Einspenner, M., & Kühl, H. S. (2017) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12790 · Cited by 284
Self-citationDesign and Analysis of Line Transect Surveys for Primates
Buckland, S. T., Plumptre, A. J., Thomas, L., & Rexstad, E. A. (2010) · International Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1007/s10764-010-9431-5 · Cited by 277
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomas, L., Buckland, S. T., Rexstad, E. A., Laake, J. L., Strindberg, S., Hedley, S. L., Bishop, J. R. B., Marques, T. A., & Burnham, K. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01-29
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-14
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W2150466677
- Cited by
- 2,197
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 75.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01737.x
- The paper
- Thomas, L., Buckland, S. T., Rexstad, E. A., Laake, J. L., Strindberg, S., Hedley, S. L., Bishop, J. R. B., Marques, T. A., & Burnham, K. P. (2010). Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01737.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.