The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantifying the sensitivity of camera traps: an adapted distance sampling approach
Open accessAbstract
Summary: 1. Abundance estimation is a pervasive goal in ecology. The rate of detection by motion‐sensitive camera traps can, in principle, provide information on the abundance of many species of terrestrial vertebrates that are otherwise difficult to survey. The random encounter model (REM,Rowcliffe et al.2008) provides a means estimating abundance from camera trap rate but requires camera sensitivity to be quantified. 2. Here, we develop a method to estimate the area effectively monitored by cameras, which is one of the most important codeterminants of detection rate. Our method borrows from distance sampling theory, applying detection function models to data on the position (distance and angle relative to the camera) where the animals are first detected. Testing the reliability of this approach through simulation, we find that bias depends on the effective detection angle assumed but was generally low at less than 5% for realistic angles typical of camera traps. 3. We adapted standard detection functions to allow for the possibility of smaller animals passing beneath the field of view close to the camera, resulting in reduced detection probability within that zone. Using a further simulation to test this approach, we find that detection distance can be estimated with little or no bias if detection probability is certain for at least some distance from the camera. 4. Applying this method to a 1‐year camera trapping data set from Barro Colorado Island, Panama, we show that effective detection distance is related strongly positively to species body mass and weakly negatively to species average speed of movement. There was also a strong seasonal effect, with shorter detection distance during the wet season. Effective detection angle is related more weakly to species body mass, and again strongly to season, with a wider angle in the wet season. 5. This method represents an important step towards practical application of the REM, including abundance estimation for relatively small (<1 kg) species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE
MacKenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Lachman, G. B., Droege, S., Andrew Royle, J., & Langtimm, C. A. (2002) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2248:esorwd]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,481
Introduction to Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations
Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., Laake, J. L., Borchers, D. L., & Thomas, L. (2001) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198506492.001.0001 · Cited by 3,055
Introduction to Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations
Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D., Burnham, K. P., Laake, J. L., Borchers, D. L., & Thomas, L. (2001) · Cited by 2,557
Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size
Thomas, L., Buckland, S. T., Rexstad, E. A., Laake, J. L., Strindberg, S., Hedley, S. L., Bishop, J. R. B., Marques, T. A., & Burnham, K. P. (2010) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01737.x · Cited by 2,197
Neotropical rainforest mammals: a field guide
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-2735 · Cited by 1,445
Crouching tigers, hidden prey: Sumatran tiger and prey populations in a tropical forest landscape
O'Brien, T. G., Kinnaird, M. F., & Wibisono, H. T. (2003) · Animal Conservation · doi:10.1017/s1367943003003172 · Cited by 1,114
Estimating animal density using camera traps without the need for individual recognition
Rowcliffe, J. M., Field, J., Turvey, S. T., & Carbone, C. (2008) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01473.x · Cited by 905
Self-citationNeotropical rainforest mammals: A field guide
Ayres, J. (1991) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(91)90062-3 · Cited by 873
Tobler, M. W., Carrillo‐Percastegui, S. E., Leite Pitman, R., Mares, R., & Powell, G. (2008) · Animal Conservation · doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2008.00169.x · Cited by 869
A Field Guide to the Mammals of Central America and Southeast Mexico
(2000) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1644/1545-1542(2000)081<0912:>2.3.co;2 · Cited by 720
Cited by
Burton, A. C., Neilson, E., Moreira, D., Ladle, A., Steenweg, R., Fisher, J. T., Bayne, E., & Boutin, S. (2015) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12432 · Cited by 1,258
Quantifying levels of animal activity using camera trap data
Rowcliffe, J. M., Kays, R., Kranstauber, B., Carbone, C., & Jansen, P. A. (2014) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12278 · Cited by 580
Self-citationDistance sampling with camera traps
Howe, E. J., Buckland, S. T., Després‐Einspenner, M., & Kühl, H. S. (2017) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12790 · Cited by 284
Validation of functional connectivity modeling: The Achilles’ heel of landscape connectivity mapping
Laliberté, J., & St-Laurent, M.-H. (2020) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103878 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Marcus Rowcliffe, J., Carbone, C., Jansen, P. A., Kays, R., & Kranstauber, B.
- Venue
- Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 464-476
- ISSN
- 2041-210X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2144068489
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 9.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantifying the sensitivity of camera traps: an adapted distance sampling approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00094.x
- The paper
- Marcus Rowcliffe, J., Carbone, C., Jansen, P. A., Kays, R., & Kranstauber, B. (2011). Quantifying the sensitivity of camera traps: an adapted distance sampling approach. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00094.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.