Cited by 247Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesForest Ecology and Biodiversity StudiesColeoptera Taxonomy and Distribution

Large carabid beetle declines in a United Kingdom monitoring network increases evidence for a widespread loss in insect biodiversity

Open access
Brooks, David R., Bater, John E., Clark, Suzanne J., Monteith, Don T., Andrews, Christopher, Corbett, Stuart J., Beaumont, Deborah A., Chapman, Jason W.·2012·Journal of Applied Ecology

Abstract

Summary: Carabid beetles are important functional components of many terrestrial ecosystems. Here, we describe the first long‐term, wide‐scale and quantitative assessment of temporal changes in UK carabid communities, to inform nationwide management aimed at their conservation. Multivariate and mixed models were used to assess temporal trends over a 15‐year period, across eleven sites in the UK Environmental Change Network. Sites covered pasture, field margins, chalk downland, woodland and hedgerows in the lowlands, moorland and pasture in the uplands, and grassland, heaths and bogs in montane locations. We found substantial overall declines in carabid biodiversity. Three‐quarters of the species studied declined, half of which were estimated to be undergoing population reductions of > 30%, when averaged over 10‐year periods. Declines of this magnitude are recognized to be of conservation concern. They are comparable to those reported for butterflies and moths and increase the evidence base showing that insects are undergoing serious and widespread biodiversity losses. Overall trends masked differences between regions and habitats. Carabid population declines (10‐year trend, averaged across species) were estimated to be 52% in montane sites, 31% in northern moorland sites and 28% in western pasture sites (with at least 80% of species declining in each case). Conversely, populations in our southern downland site had 10‐year increases of 48% on average. Overall, biodiversity was maintained in upland pasture, and populations were mostly stable in woodland and hedgerow sites. Synthesis and applications . Our results highlight the need to assess trends for carabids, and probably other widespread and ubiquitous taxa, across regions and habitats to fully understand losses in biodiversity. Land management should be underpinned by a consideration of how wide‐scale environmental drivers interact with habitat structure. The stability of population trends in woodlands and hedgerows of species that are declining elsewhere puts these habitats at the fore‐front of integrated landscape management aimed at preserving their ecosystem services.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02194.x

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies have documented declines in arthropod abundance across a broad range of geography, habitats, and taxa.

    “Other studies have also documented declines in arthropod abundance across a broad range of geography, habitats, and taxa (10–12, 54, 55, 56–58).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ter Braak, C.J.F. (1995) Ordination. Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology (eds R.H.G. Longman, C.J.F. ter Braak & O.F.R. Van Tongeren), pp. 91-169. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brooks, D. R., Bater, J. E., Clark, S. J., Monteith, D. T., Andrews, C., Corbett, S. J., Beaumont, D. A., & Chapman, J. W.
Affiliations
  • Rothamsted Research (GB)
  • The NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Lancaster Environment Centre Library Avenue Bailrigg Lancaster LA1 4AP UK
  • UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB)
  • Porton Down Salisbury Wiltshire SP4 0JQ UK
  • University of Exeter (GB)
Corresponding author
Brooks, David R.
Venue
Journal of Applied Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-08-31
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
1009-1019
ISSN
  • 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2664
OpenAlex
W2122373543
Cited by
247
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5
FWCI
6.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (acceptedVersion)
  • Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Scottish Environment Protection Agency
  • Northern Ireland Environment Agency
  • Scottish Natural Heritage
  • Natural England
  • Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Defence Science and Technology Laboratory
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBS/E/C/00005195, BBS/E/C/00004969, BBS/E/C/00005189)
  • Natural Environment Research Council
  • Defence Science and Technology Group
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
Keywords
ground beetles, population decline (ecology), long-term monitoring, habitat differences, moorland, upland pastures, montane grassland, land management, ecosystem services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review