The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A numerical taxonomic study of lactic acid bacteria from vacuum‐packed beef, pork, lamb and bacon
Abstract
S haw B. G. & H arding C harmaigne D. 1984. A numerical taxonomic study of lactic acid bacteria from vacuum packed beef, pork, lamb and bacon. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 56 , 25–40. A numerical taxonomic study using 79 unit characters has been performed on 100 isolates of lactic acid bacteria from refrigerated vacuum‐packed beef, pork, lamb and bacon. Three clusters were observed at 78% S which contained all the strains apart from three unidentifiable streptobacteria, one Leuconostoc , and one strain of Pediococcus pentosaceus . One cluster (III) consisted of only one strain of Leuc. paramesenteroides and six unidentifiable Leuconostoc strains. The two largest clusters (I and II) were both composed entirely of streptobacteria. Cluster I contained 31 strains (G + C content 33–2–36–9 moles %) which were not identifiable with any described species. Cluster II contained 57 strains (G + C content 40–7–43–7 moles %) which were provisionally identified with Lactobacillus sake or Lact. bavaricus according to the lactic acid isomer produced. The division of nearly all the streptobacteria into two clearly defined clusters has resolved problems which have existed in the classification of lactic acid bacteria from vacuum‐packed meat.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A medium for the cultivation of lactobacilli
De MAN, J. C., ROGOSA, M., & SHARPE, M. E. (1960) · Journal of Applied Bacteriology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1960.tb00188.x · Cited by 5,311
A selective medium for the isolation and enumeration of oral and fecal lactobacilli
Rogosa, M., Mitchell, J. A., & Wiseman, R. F. (1951) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.62.1.132-133.1951 · Cited by 653
Cited by
Zheng, J., Wittouck, S., Salvetti, E., Franz, C. M. A. P., Harris, H. M. B., Mattarelli, P., O’Toole, P. W., Pot, B., Vandamme, P., Walter, J., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.004107 · Cited by 3,313
Biopreservation by lactic acid bacteria
Stiles, M. E. (1996) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1007/bf00395940 · Cited by 733
Potential of bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria for improvements in food safety and quality
O’Sullivan, L., Ross, R. P., & Hill, C. (2002) · Biochimie · doi:10.1016/s0300-9084(02)01457-8 · Cited by 446
Mesophilic and Psychrotrophic Bacteria from Meat and Their Spoilage Potential In Vitro and in Beef
Ercolini, D., Russo, F., Nasi, A., Ferranti, P., & Villani, F. (2009) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02762-08 · Cited by 384
The Genera Lactobacillus and Carnobacterium
(2011) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_3731 · Cited by 382
Metadata
- Authors
- Shaw, B. G., & Harding, C. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Bacteriology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-02
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-40
- ISSN
- 0021-8847 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031361173
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A numerical taxonomic study of lactic acid bacteria from vacuum‐packed beef, pork, lamb and bacon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1984.tb04693.x
- The paper
- Shaw, B. G., & Harding, C. D. (1984). A numerical taxonomic study of lactic acid bacteria from vacuum‐packed beef, pork, lamb and bacon. Journal of Applied Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1984.tb04693.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.