Cited by 97Yeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesFermentation and Sensory AnalysisProbiotics and Fermented Foods

Molecular assessment of indigenous yeast population from traditional balsamic vinegar

Open access
Solieri, L., Landi, S., De Vero, L., Giudici, P.·2006·Journal of Applied Microbiology

Abstract

AIMS: To identify and describe the indigenous yeast population involved in traditional balsamic vinegar (TBV) fermentation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the restriction analysis of the ribosomal region 5.8S (5.8S rRNA) and the internal transcribed spacers 1 and 2 (5.8S-ITS region) we were able to group 133 strains isolated from 17 cooked grape must samples into 10 different yeast species, included into 4 genera. Moreover, we sequenced the D1/D2 domains of the 26S rRNA and confirmed the reliability of each identification at species level. Most strains belonged to the genus Zygosaccharomyces. In particular, Zygosaccharomyces bailii was found in 41% of the samples, followed by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Zygosaccharomyces pseudorouxii and Candida stellata. Strains belonging respectively to Zygosaccharomyces mellis, Zygosaccharomyces bisporus, Zygosaccharomyces rouxii, Hanseniaspora valbyensis, Hanseniaspora osmophila and Candida lactis-condensi species were also detected. Despite the great number of species recovered, the mtDNA restriction profiles showed low variability at strain level. Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates with an higher degree of intraspecific variance were considered an exception. CONCLUSIONS: Many different indigenous yeast species were recovered and TBV yeasts population seems to be far more complex than what was reported in previous literature. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study has allowed us to gain a better understanding of the indigenous yeast species of TBV cooked must.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02906.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the present study, glucose was utilized more rapidly than fructose.

    “However, in the present study, glucose was utilized more rapidly than fructose, perhaps because Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast strains preferentially ferment glucose (Solieri et al., 2006).”

    From Physicochemical properties and antioxidant activity of banana vinegar produced using one-stage and two-stage fermentation (2019) · cites this paper as Solieri et al., 2006

    The supplied copy contains a repository record for the paper, but no article text or results. Searches for preferential glucose fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and for glucose versus fructose utilization found no passage addressing the explanation attributed to Solieri et al. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast strains preferentially ferment glucose.

    “However, in the present study, glucose was utilized more rapidly than fructose, perhaps because Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast strains preferentially ferment glucose (Solieri et al., 2006).”

    From Physicochemical properties and antioxidant activity of banana vinegar produced using one-stage and two-stage fermentation (2019) · cites this paper as Solieri et al., 2006

    The available copy is an IRIS catalog record with publication details, not the paper's study text; it provides no section or page addressing sugar fermentation. Searches for preferential glucose fermentation and glucose use relative to fructose found no relevant passage, so the claim cannot be assessed from this copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Solieri, L., Landi, S., De Vero, L., & Giudici, P.
Affiliations
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
Corresponding author
Solieri, L.
Venue
Journal of Applied Microbiology
Published
2006-07
Volume
101
Issue
1
Pages
63-71
ISSN
  • 1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2672
OpenAlex
W1981396590
Cited by
97
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
traditional balsamic vinegar, indigenous yeast strains, vinegar fermentation, Zygosaccharomyces bailii, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida stellata, Zygosaccharomyces, yeast identification, 5.8S rRNA, ITS region, intraspecific variation
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Fermentation, Food Microbiology, Genes, Fungal, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, RNA, Fungal, Yeasts, Mycological Typing Techniques, Ecosystem, Acetic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review