The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diversity of tetracycline resistance genes in bacteria from aquaculture sources in Australia: Tetracycline resistance aquaculture
Open accessAbstract
AIMS: To determine the genetic determinants responsible for tetracycline resistance in oxytetracycline resistant bacteria from aquaculture sources in Australia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty of 104 (19%) isolates tested were resistant to oxytetracycline (MIC > or = 16 microg ml(-1)). Using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification, one or more tet genes were detected in 15/20 (75%) isolates tested, but none were found in 5/20 (25%). tetM (50%) was the most common determinant, followed by tetE (45%), tetA (35%) and tetD (15%). Five of 12 oxytetracycline resistant isolates studied were able to transfer their R-plasmid to Escherichia coli recipients of chicken, pig and human origin. tetA, tetD and tetM were found to be transferred while tetE was not transferred. Southern hybridization and PCR were used to confirm transfer of determinants. CONCLUSIONS: Bacterial isolates from aquaculture sources in Australia harbour a variety of tetracycline resistance genes, which can be transferred to other bacteria of different origin. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Bacteria from aquaculture sources in Australia contribute to the resistance gene pool reservoir. The in vitro transfer of tetracycline R-plasmid from aquatic bacteria to E. coli isolates from various sources is an indication of the potential public health risk associated with these resistance determinants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sougakoff, W., Papadopoulou, B., Nordmann, P., & Courvalin, P. (1987) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.1987.tb02260.x · Cited by 124
Cited by
Human Health Consequences of Use of Antimicrobial Agents in Aquaculture
Heuer, O. E., Kruse, H., Grave, K., Collignon, P., Karunasagar, I., & Angulo, F. J. (2009) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/605667 · Cited by 533
Yukgehnaish, K., Kumar, P., Sivachandran, P., Marimuthu, K., Arshad, A., Paray, B. A., & Arockiaraj, J. (2020) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12416 · Cited by 470
Roberts, M. C., & Schwarz, S. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2015.04.0207 · Cited by 192
Metadata
- Authors
- Akinbowale, O. L., Peng, H., & Barton, M. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-07-30
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2016-2025
- ISSN
- 1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1609904836
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diversity of tetracycline resistance genes in bacteria from aquaculture sources in Australia: Tetracycline resistance aquaculture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03445.x
- The paper
- Akinbowale, O. L., Peng, H., & Barton, M. D. (2007). Diversity of tetracycline resistance genes in bacteria from aquaculture sources in Australia: Tetracycline resistance aquaculture. Journal of Applied Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03445.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.