The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of different carbon sources on bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus strain ATCC 53524
Abstract
AIMS: To determine the effect of carbon sources on cellulose produced by Gluconacetobacter xylinus strain ATCC 53524, and to characterize the purity and structural features of the cellulose produced. METHODS AND RESULTS: Modified Hestrin Schramm medium containing the carbon sources mannitol, glucose, glycerol, fructose, sucrose or galactose were inoculated with Ga. xylinus strain ATCC 53524. Plate counts indicated that all carbon sources supported growth of the strain. Sucrose and glycerol gave the highest cellulose yields of 3.83 and 3.75 g l(-1) respectively after 96 h fermentation, primarily due to a surge in cellulose production in the last 12 h. Mannitol, fructose or glucose resulted in consistent rates of cellulose production and yields of >2.5 g l(-1). Solid state (13)C CP/MAS NMR revealed that irrespective of the carbon source, the cellulose produced by ATCC 53524 was pure and highly crystalline. Scanning electron micrographs illustrated the densely packed network of cellulose fibres within the pellicles and that the different carbon sources did not markedly alter the micro-architecture of the resulting cellulose pellicles. CONCLUSIONS: The production rate of bacterial cellulose by Ga. xylinus (ATCC 53524) was influenced by different carbon sources, but the product formed was indistinguishable in molecular and microscopic features. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Our studies for the first time examined the influence of different carbon sources on the rate of cellulose production by Ga. xylinus ATCC 53524, and the molecular and microscopic features of the cellulose produced.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cellulose biosynthesis and function in bacteria
Ross, P., Mayer, R., & Benziman, M. (1991) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.55.1.35-58.1991 · Cited by 1,248
Cellulose biosynthesis and function in bacteria
Ross, P., Mayer, R., & Benziman, M. (1991) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.55.1.35-58.1991 · Cited by 1,231 · cited 9×
“A notable feature of this microorganism is its ability to produce cellulose, with a high degree of crystallinity, thus distinguishing it from plant cellulose (Cannon and Anderson 1991; Ross et al. 1991).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHestrin, S., & Schramm, M. (1954) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj0580345 · Cited by 1,198
Studies of microstructure in native celluloses using solid-state carbon-13 NMR
VanderHart, D. L., & Atalla, R. H. (1984) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00138a009 · Cited by 613
Molecular biology of cellulose production in bacteria
Römling, U. (2002) · Research in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0923-2508(02)01316-5 · Cited by 372
Cellulose structure and biosynthesis: What is in store for the 21st century?
Brown, R. M. (2004) · Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry · doi:10.1002/pola.10877 · Cited by 331
(2005) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/ijs.0.63767-0 · Cited by 278
Yamada, Y., Hoshino, K.-I., & Ishikawa, T. (1997) · Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry · doi:10.1271/bbb.61.1244 · Cited by 270
Production of cellulose from glucose by Acetobacter xylinum
Masaoka, S., Ohe, T., & Sakota, N. (1993) · Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering · doi:10.1016/0922-338x(93)90171-4 · Cited by 269
Biogenesis of Bacterial Cellulose
Cannon, R. E., & Anderson, S. M. (1991) · Critical Reviews in Microbiology · doi:10.3109/10408419109115207 · Cited by 252
Cited by
Advances in bacterial exopolysaccharides: from production to Biotechnological applications
Freitas, F., Alves, V. D., & Reis, M. A. M. (2011) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.03.008 · Cited by 804
Marsh, A. J., O'Sullivan, O., Hill, C., Ross, R. P., & Cotter, P. D. (2014) · Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.fm.2013.09.003 · Cited by 485
Biosynthesis, production and applications of bacterial cellulose
Lin, S.-P., Loira Calvar, I., Catchmark, J. M., Liu, J.-R., Demirci, A., & Cheng, K.-C. (2013) · Cellulose · doi:10.1007/s10570-013-9994-3 · Cited by 473
Coton, M., Pawtowski, A., Taminiau, B., Burgaud, G., Deniel, F., Coulloumme-Labarthe, L., Fall, A., Daube, G., & Coton, E. (2017) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1093/femsec/fix048 · Cited by 333
Urbina, L., Corcuera, M. Á., Gabilondo, N., Eceiza, A., & Retegi, A. (2021) · Cellulose · doi:10.1007/s10570-021-04020-4 · Cited by 201
Metadata
- Authors
- Mikkelsen, D., Flanagan, B. M., Dykes, G. A., & Gidley, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 576-583
- ISSN
- 1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2672
- OpenAlex
- W1999899881
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 2.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of different carbon sources on bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus strain ATCC 53524. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04226.x
- The paper
- Mikkelsen, D., Flanagan, B. M., Dykes, G. A., & Gidley, M. J. (2009). Influence of different carbon sources on bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus strain ATCC 53524. Journal of Applied Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04226.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.