Cited by 33Infection Control and VentilationAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic PrecipitationIndoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure

Assessment of iodine-treated filter media for removal and inactivation of MS2 bacteriophage aerosols

Open access
Lee, J.-H., Wu, C.-Y., Lee, C.N., Anwar, D., Wysocki, K.M., Lundgren, D.A., Farrah, S., Wander, J. +1 more·2009·Journal of Applied Microbiology

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate the performance of an iodine-releasing filter medium for use as a protective device against airborne pathogens. METHODS AND RESULTS: The filter's physical and viable removal efficiencies (VRE) were investigated with challenges of MS2 bacteriophage aerosols, and the infectivity of MS2 collected on the filter was analysed. To test a proposed inactivation mechanism, media containing thiosulfate or bovine serum albumin (BSA) were put in impingers to quench and consume I(2) released from the filter. In direct plating experiments, treated filters presented significantly higher VREs than did untreated filters; however, collection in excess BSA decreased VRE by half and in thiosulfate the apparent VRE decreased drastically. No significant difference in infectivity of retained viruses on treated and untreated filters was observed at the same environmental condition. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence presented herein for competition by dissolved I(2) in infectivity assays supports a mechanism of induced displacement and capture of I(2.) It also requires that dissociation of iodine from the filter and capture of iodine by MS2 aerosols as they pass through the filter be factored in the design of the assessment methodology. The filter's strong retention capability minimizes reaerosolization but also makes it difficult to discriminate the antimicrobial effect at the surface. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study shows the direct plating assay method to be sensitive to interference by iodine-releasing materials. This requires reevaluation of earlier reports of VRE measurements.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04375.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sublimated iodine can be inadvertently captured in the impinger medium and produce a biocidal effect during the sampling period, making it impossible to distinguish whether microorganism kill occurs in the airborne state or in the impinger medium.

    “a previous study of bioaerosol filtration by iodine-treated AM-FFRs by Lee et al. (26) reported that sublimated iodine could be inadvertently captured in the impinger medium and produce a biocidal effect during the sampling period, making it impossible to distinguish whether microorganism kill occurs in the airborne state or in the impinger medium.”

    From Performance of Conventional and Antimicrobial-Treated Filtering Facepiece Respirators Challenged with Biological Aerosols (2012) · cites this paper as Lee et al. (26)

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • No statistical differences in PEN V were observed for the AM-FFR tested with or without the iodine neutralizer.

    “Thus, in contrast to Lee et al., (26) no statistical differences in PEN V were observed for the AM-FFR tested with or without the iodine neutralizer in our study.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hinds, W.C. (1999) Filtration. In Aerosol Technology. 2nd edn. pp. 182-205. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  2. Opresko, L., Wiley, H.S. and Wallace, R.A. (1980a) Proteins iodinated by the chloramine-T method appear to be degraded at an abnormally rapid rate after endocytosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 77, 1556-1560.
  3. Prescott, L.M., Harley, J.P. and Klein, D.A. (2002) Micro- biology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, J.-H., Wu, C.-Y., Lee, C. N., Anwar, D., Wysocki, K. M., Lundgren, D. A., Farrah, S., Wander, J., & Heimbuch, B. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Dow Chemical (United States) (US)
  • United States Air Force Research Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Wu, C.-Y.
Venue
Journal of Applied Microbiology
Published
2009-12
Volume
107
Issue
6
Pages
1912-1923
ISSN
  • 1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2672
OpenAlex
W2097161448
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Florida
  • U.S. Air Force
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Keywords
bacteriophage MS2, airborne virus inactivation, thiosulfate, bovine serum albumin
MeSH terms
Aerosols, Air Microbiology, Filtration, Iodine, Respiratory Protective Devices, Levivirus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review