Cited by 170Child Therapy and DevelopmentChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifePediatric Pain Management Techniques

The effectiveness of therapeutic play, using virtual reality computer games, in promoting the psychological well‐being of children hospitalised with cancer

Li, William HC, Chung, Joyce OK, Ho, Eva KY·2011·Journal of Clinical Nursing

Abstract

Aims. To examine the effectiveness of therapeutic play, using virtual reality computer games, in minimising anxiety and reducing depressive symptoms in Hong Kong Chinese children hospitalised with cancer. Background. There has been an increase in the use of therapeutic play intervention to help children cope with the stress of hospitalisation. However, it is not clear whether therapeutic play is an appropriate psychological intervention for Chinese children hospitalised with cancer. Design. A non‐equivalent control group pretest–post‐test, between‐subject design was employed. Method. Hong Kong Chinese Children (8–16 years of age), admitted to a paediatric oncology ward for the treatment of cancer during a 14‐month period, were invited to participate in the study. Of the 122 children, 70 formed the control group receiving routine nursing care and 52 in the experimental group receiving therapeutic play interventions. Results. The results showed that children in the experimental group reported statistically significant fewer depressive symptoms than children in the control group on day 7. The results, however, find no differences in children’s anxiety scores between the two groups on day 7. Conclusion. The study provides empirical evidence to support the effectiveness of therapeutic play, using virtual reality computer games, in the psychological preparation of children hospitalised with cancer, thus charting a path towards promoting holistic and quality care. Relevance to clinical practice. The findings heighten the awareness in healthcare professionals that play is a very important part of children’s life and that they need play even when they are ill.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03733.x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, W. H., Chung, J. O., & Ho, E. K.
Affiliations
University of Hong Kong (HK)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-06-08
Volume
20
Issue
15-16
Pages
2135-2143
ISSN
  • 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2702
OpenAlex
W2168855602
Cited by
170
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Hong Kong Education Bibliographic Database (submittedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Hospital Authority
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Therapy and Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
therapeutic play, childhood cancer, hospitalized children, anxiety, depressive symptoms, psychological well-being, Chinese children, psychological intervention
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Child, Hong Kong, Humans, Neoplasms, Play and Playthings, User-Computer Interface

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review