Cited by 20Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsOnline and Blended Learning

Adapting and personalizing the communication in a synchronous communication tool

Gogoulou, A., Gouli, E., Grigoriadou, M.·2008·Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we present a synchronous text‐based communication tool, referred to as Adaptive Communication Tool (ACT), which provides capabilities for adaptation and personalization. ACT supports both the free and the structured form of dialogue. The structured dialogue is implemented by two types of Scaffolding Sentence Templates (SST); i.e. sentence openers or communicative acts. The capability of adaptation is considered in the sense of making suggestions for the supported form of dialogue and SST type and providing the most meaningful and complete set of SST with respect to the learning outcomes addressed by the collaborative learning activity and the model of collaboration followed by the group members. Also, ACT enables learners to have control on the adaptation by selecting the form of dialogue and the SST type they prefer to use and enriching the provided SST set with their own ones in order to cover their communication needs. The results from the formative evaluation of the tool showed that (i) the proposed dialogue form, SST type and the provided set of SST cover students' communication needs, (ii) the capability of personalizing the communication by selecting the desired communication means as well as by enriching the provided SST set satisfied students, and (iii) students used adequately both types of SST resulting into on‐task and coherent dialogues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00254.x

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It was suggested that systematic modelling should analyze three dimensions in the education context: learner's variation, learning domains, and learning activities.

    “It was suggested that systematic modelling should analyze three dimensions in the education context: learner's variation, learning domains, and learning activities [25,26].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gogoulou, A., Gouli, E., & Grigoriadou, M.
Affiliations
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
Venue
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-09-03
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
203-216
ISSN
  • 0266-4909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2729
OpenAlex
W2150463884
Cited by
20
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
adaptive communication, personalization, structured dialogue, text-based communication, cooperative learning, learner control, communication needs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review