The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to offer some reflections on the relationships between digital technologies and learning. It is argued that activities of learning, as they have been practised within institutionalized schooling, are coming under increasing pressure from the developments of digital technologies and the capacities to store, access and manipulate information that such resources offer. Thus, the technologies do not merely support learning; they transform how we learn and how we come to interpret learning. The metaphors of learning currently emerging as relevant in the new media ecology emphasize the transformational and performative nature of such activities, and of knowing in general. These developments make the hybrid nature of human knowing and learning obvious; what we know and master is, to an increasing extent, a function of the mediating tools we are familiar with. At a theoretical and practical level, this implies that the interdependences between human agency, minds, bodies and technologies have to serve as foundations when attempting to understand and improve learning. Attempts to account for what people know without integrating their mastery of increasingly sophisticated technologies into the picture will lack ecological validity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 2: Do They Really Think Differently?
Prensky, M. (2001) · On the Horizon · doi:10.1108/10748120110424843 · Cited by 4,035
Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking.
James, W. (1907) · doi:10.1037/10851-000 · Cited by 1,804
Cited by
From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework
Falloon, G. (2020) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4 · Cited by 1,372
“Säljö (2010) suggests that in assessing the impact of digital technology on learning, we need to broaden our perspective to consider not only knowledge outcomes, but also how these outcomes were arrived at, through using digital artefacts.”
BackgroundInfluentialPostdigital Education in Design and Practice
Fawns, T. (2019) · Postdigital Science and Education · doi:10.1007/s42438-018-0021-8 · Cited by 365
Rethinking assessment in a digital age: opportunities, challenges and risks
Timmis, S., Broadfoot, P., Sutherland, R., & Oldfield, A. (2016) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.3215 · Cited by 265
What Does Professional Digital Competence Mean in Teacher Education?
Lund, A., Furberg, A., Bakken, J., & Engelien, K. L. (2014) · Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy · doi:10.18261/issn1891-943x-2014-04-04 · Cited by 209
McGrath, C., Cerratto Pargman, T., Juth, N., & Palmgren, P. J. (2023) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100139 · Cited by 195
Metadata
- Authors
- Säljö, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01-12
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-64
- ISSN
- 0266-4909 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2729
- OpenAlex
- W1529387059
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 75.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00341.x
- The paper
- Säljö, R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00341.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.