The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The questionable promise of social media for education: connective learning and the commercial imperative
Abstract
Facebook and other social media have been hailed as delivering the promise of new, socially engaged educational experiences for students in undergraduate, self‐directed, and other educational sectors. A theoretical and historical analysis of these media in the light of earlier media transformations, however, helps to situate and qualify this promise. Specifically, the analysis of dominant social media presented here questions whether social media platforms satisfy a crucial component of learning – fostering the capacity for debate and disagreement. By using the analytical frame of media theorist Raymond Williams, with its emphasis on the influence of advertising in the content and form of television, we weigh the conditions of dominant social networking sites as constraints for debate and therefore learning. Accordingly, we propose an update to Williams' erudite work that is in keeping with our findings. Williams' critique focuses on the structural characteristics of sequence, rhythm, and flow of television as a cultural form. Our critique proposes the terms information design, architecture, and above all algorithm, as structural characteristics that similarly apply to the related but contemporary cultural form of social networking services. Illustrating the ongoing salience of media theory and history for research in e‐learning, the article updates Williams' work while leveraging it in a critical discussion of the suitability of commercial social media for education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/s1096-7516(00)00016-6 · Cited by 6,619
Cited by
van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001 · Cited by 2,951
The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual) – A literature review
Tess, P. A. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.032 · Cited by 984
“Together we are better”: Professional learning networks for teachers
Trust, T., Krutka, D. G., & Carpenter, J. P. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.007 · Cited by 559
Veletsianos, G., Houlden, S., Hodson, J., & Gosse, C. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444818781324 · Cited by 173
Teaching “Against” Social Media: Confronting Problems of Profit in the Curriculum
Krutka, D. G., Manca, S., Galvin, S. M., Greenhow, C., Koehler, M. J., & Askari, E. (2019) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146811912101410 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Friesen, N., & Lowe, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-08-02
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 183-194
- ISSN
- 0266-4909 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2729
- OpenAlex
- W1958076088
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 30.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The questionable promise of social media for education: connective learning and the commercial imperative. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00426.x
- The paper
- Friesen, N., & Lowe, S. (2012). The questionable promise of social media for education: connective learning and the commercial imperative. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00426.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.