The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Plant traits and temporal scale: evidence from a 5‐year invasion experiment using native species
Open accessAbstract
1 A long-term experiment was established in 1990 in which seeds of 54 native species, not originally present at the site, were sown into a fertility × disturbance matrix established in unproductive limestone grassland at the Buxton Climate Change Impacts Laboratory (BCCIL). The objective was to examine the roles of productivity and disturbance as major factors controlling the invasibility of plant communities, and to identify the functional characteristics of successful invaders in response to different types of invasion opportunity. The results of the first 2 years of the study have already been published. 2 After 2 years, invasion was strongly promoted by disturbance and less so by increased fertility. Three years later the cover of invaders had declined over most of the matrix, and the greatest cover of sown species was where the highest levels of fertility and disturbance coincided. However, no part of the fertility–disturbance matrix was immune to invasion and the area of the matrix occupied by each of the sown species that successfully established was unique. Abundance of invaders was reduced by low soil pH. 3 The identity and distribution of the successful invaders changed as the early stages of invasion gave way to a later stage of consolidation. After 2 years regenerative traits (seed mass and germination characteristics) were the best predictors of success. After 5 years these traits were unrelated to success of the invaders, the most successful invaders were perennial grasses, and no single trait was a good predictor of invasiveness. 4 Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that invasions are promoted by an increase in the availability of resources, either through addition of extra resources or a reduction in their use by the resident vegetation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Consequences of More Extreme Precipitation Regimes for Terrestrial Ecosystems
Knapp, A. K., Beier, C., Briske, D. D., Classen, A. T., Luo, Y., Reichstein, M., Smith, M. D., Smith, S. D., Bell, J. E., Fay, P. A., et al. (2008) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/b580908 · Cited by 1,250
Resource competition in plant invasions: emerging patterns and research needs
Gioria, M., & Osborne, B. A. (2014) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00501 · Cited by 437
Kudzu (Pueraria montana): History, Physiology, and Ecology Combine to Make a Major Ecosystem Threat
Forseth, I. N., & Innis, A. F. (2004) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352680490505150 · Cited by 259
Skousen, J. G., & Venable, C. L. (2008) · Land Degradation & Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.846 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson, K., Hodgson, J. G., Grime, J. P., & Burke, M. J. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1054-1060
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2745
- OpenAlex
- W2022726756
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant traits and temporal scale: evidence from a 5‐year invasion experiment using native species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2001.00627.x
- The paper
- Thompson, K., Hodgson, J. G., Grime, J. P., & Burke, M. J. W. (2001). Plant traits and temporal scale: evidence from a 5‐year invasion experiment using native species. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2001.00627.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.