The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ontogenetic shift from facilitation to competition in a desert shrub
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Spatiotemporal responses to habitat conditions are important components of plant population and community dynamics. Plant stage or size is a common predictor of plant performance for a range of ecological conditions, including responses to neighbours. Plant response to local conditions varies from seedling establishment through to senescence, with strong implications for population regulation. I investigated size‐dependent responses to near adult neighbours among a uniquely quantitative sample of mapped juvenile and adult bur‐sage (Ambrosia dumosa), a common shrub in the Colorado Desert of California. Analyses of juvenile establishment and survival for two 5‐year census periods from 1984 to 1989 and 1989 to 1994 determined that germination and survival was greater for juveniles located under adults compared with away from adults. However, analyses of neighbour effects on growth of plants from the 1984 cohort showed that near adult neighbours improved juvenile growth over the 10‐year interval from 1984 to 1994, but reduced adult growth. A size‐dependent, ontogenetic shift occurs because neighbouring adult plants significantly improve the demographic performance of juveniles, but diminish that of larger established plants. The ontogenetic niche shift may be a useful framework to describe such differential responses of juvenile and adult plants. The utility of this framework is that responses to spatial and temporal variability in the environment are clearly demonstrated through ontogenetic constraints on plant performance, which provide an alternative mechanism of coexistence within and between species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hapeman, D. E. (1991) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1991.10484817 · Cited by 9,373
Harper, J. L. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 9,128
Trenbath, B., & Harper, J. L. (1978) · The Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2402622 · Cited by 6,942
THE MAINTENANCE OF SPECIES‐RICHNESS IN PLANT COMMUNITIES: THE IMPORTANCE OF THE REGENERATION NICHE
GRUBB, P. J. (1977) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1977.tb01347.x · Cited by 4,402
The Ontogenetic Niche and Species Interactions in Size-Structured Populations
Werner, E. E., & Gilliam, J. F. (1984) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.002141 · Cited by 2,886
The Ontogenetic Niche and Species Interactions in Size-Structured Populations
Werner, E. (1984) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.15.1.393 · Cited by 2,556
COMPETITION AND FACILITATION: A SYNTHETIC APPROACH TO INTERACTIONS IN PLANT COMMUNITIES
Callaway, R. M., & Walker, L. R. (1997) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1958:cafasa]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,016
A gentle introduction to quantile regression for ecologists
Cade, B. S., & Noon, B. R. (2003) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0412:agitqr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,855
Positive interactions among plants
Callaway, R. M. (1995) · The Botanical Review · doi:10.1007/bf02912621 · Cited by 1,687
Ecology of sprouting in woody plants: the persistence niche
Bond, W. J., & Midgley, J. J. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(00)02033-4 · Cited by 1,500
Cited by
Germination, Postgermination Adaptation, and Species Ecological Ranges
Donohue, K., Rubio de Casas, R., Burghardt, L., Kovach, K., & Willis, C. G. (2010) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144715 · Cited by 934
Global shifts towards positive species interactions with increasing environmental stress
He, Q., Bertness, M. D., & Altieri, A. H. (2013) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12080 · Cited by 931
Gómez‐Aparicio, L. (2009) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01573.x · Cited by 512
Soliveres, S., Smit, C., & Maestre, F. T. (2015) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12110 · Cited by 281
Price, N. (2010) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-010-1578-4 · Cited by 203
Metadata
- Authors
- MIRITI, M. N.
- Venue
- Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-05-23
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 973-979
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2745
- OpenAlex
- W2043801469
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 12.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ontogenetic shift from facilitation to competition in a desert shrub. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01138.x
- The paper
- MIRITI, M. N. (2006). Ontogenetic shift from facilitation to competition in a desert shrub. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01138.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.