The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Specificity and resilience in the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi of a natural woodland community
Open accessAbstract
Summary: The composition of communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi can have a large effect on the performance of their plant hosts. The role of individual fungal species in shaping this response is as yet unresolved. We have used the fungicide benomyl to alter the community of AM fungi in undisturbed monoliths of soil in a natural community. Changes in the community were characterized by root colonization (%RLC), cloning, sequencing and tRFLP of a partial SSUrDNA fragment. Eleven plant species were sufficiently abundant in the monoliths to be examined. In the highly mycorrhiza‐dependent perennial herb Ajuga reptans, phosphate concentration was significantly reduced after benomyl treatment over a full growing season. The other plant species showed low colonization and no significant difference in phosphate concentration after benomyl treatment. Although colonization in A. reptans was reduced, many mycorrhizal fungi survived in the roots. Some became more abundant following fungicide treatment, suggesting competitive release. Fungi that increased were generalists that have been identified in field samples from published studies colonizing a wide range of plant species. Those that declined were specialists with a narrow host range; five types had not been recorded previously in field samples. AM fungi in this study differed greatly in their response to perturbation, independent of the identity of the host plant. If such functional diversity is widespread, then elucidating the part played by AM fungal diversity in regulating plant community structure will be key to our understanding and management of ecosystems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Van Der Heijden, M. G. A., Bardgett, R. D., & Van Straalen, N. M. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01139.x · Cited by 5,053
Relative roles of niche and neutral processes in structuring a soil microbial community
Dumbrell, A. J., Nelson, M., Helgason, T., Dytham, C., & Fitter, A. H. (2010) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2009.122 · Cited by 904
Self-citationMycorrhizal Networks: Common Goods of Plants Shared under Unequal Terms of Trade
Walder, F., Niemann, H., Natarajan, M., Lehmann, M. F., Boller, T., & Wiemken, A. (2012) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.112.195727 · Cited by 398
Verbruggen, E., Röling, W. F. M., Gamper, H. A., Kowalchuk, G. A., Verhoef, H. A., & van der Heijden, M. G. A. (2010) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03230.x · Cited by 382
Lin, X., Feng, Y., Zhang, H., Chen, R., Wang, J., Zhang, J., & Chu, H. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es3001695 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- HELGASON, T., MERRYWEATHER, J. W., YOUNG, J. P. W., & FITTER, A. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-04-25
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 623-630
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2745
- OpenAlex
- W1978071010
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Specificity and resilience in the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi of a natural woodland community. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01239.x
- The paper
- HELGASON, T., MERRYWEATHER, J. W., YOUNG, J. P. W., & FITTER, A. H. (2007). Specificity and resilience in the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi of a natural woodland community. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01239.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.