Cited by 48Chronic Disease Management StrategiesPrimary Care and Health OutcomesGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Implementation of complex adaptive chronic care: the P atient J ourney R ecord system (PaJR)

Martin, Carmel M., Vogel, Carl, Grady, Deirdre, Zarabzadeh, Atieh, Hederman, Lucy, Kellett, John, Smith, Kevin, O’ Shea, Brendan·2012·Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

Abstract

Background: The P atient J ourney R ecord system (P a JR) is an application of a complex adaptive chronic care model in which early detection of adverse changes in patient biopsychosocial trajectories prompts tailored care, constitute the cornerstone of the model. Aims: To evaluate the P a JR system's impact on care and the experiences of older people with chronic illness, who were at risk of repeat admissions over 12 months. Design: Community‐based cohort study – random assignment into intervention and usual care group, with process and outcome evaluation. Study population: Adult and older patients with multiple morbidity, one or more chronic diseases with one or more overnight hospitalizations, and seven or more general practice visits in the past 6 months. Complex intervention: P a JR lay care guides/advocates call patients and their caregivers. The care guides summarize their semi‐structured conversations about health concerns and well‐being. Predictive modelling and rules‐based algorithms trigger alerts in relation to online call summaries. Alerts are acted upon according to agreed guidelines. Analysis: Descriptive and comparative statistics. Outcomes: Impact on unplanned emergency ambulatory care sensitive admissions (ACSC) with an overnight stay; sensitivity of alerts and predictions; rates of care guides‐supported activities. Findings: Five part‐time lay care guides and a care manager monitored 153 intervention patients for 500 person months with 5050 phone calls. The 153 patients in the intervention group were comparable to the 61 controls. The intervention group reported in 50% of calls that their health limited their social activities; and one‐third of calls reported immediate health concerns. Predictive analytics were highly sensitive to risk of hospitalization. ACSC admissions were reduced by 50% compared to controls across the sites. Discussion: The initial implementation of a complex patient‐centred adaptive chronic care model using lay care guides, supported by machine learning, appeared sensitive to risk of hospitalization and capable of stabilizing illness journeys in older patients with multi‐morbidity. Conclusion: Actions based on alerts produced in this study appeared to significantly reduce hospitalizations. This paves the way for further testing of the model.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01880.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin, C. M., Vogel, C., Grady, D., Zarabzadeh, A., Hederman, L., Kellett, J., Smith, K., & O’ Shea, B.
Affiliations
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
  • University College Cork (IE)
  • NOSM University (CA)
  • Department of Public Health and Primary Care Trinity College Dublin Dublin Ireland
Venue
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-07-22
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
1226-1234
ISSN
  • 1356-1294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2753
OpenAlex
W1594029017
Cited by
48
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
care managers, hospital readmission prevention, ambulatory care sensitive conditions, multimorbidity, predictive analytics, patient-centered care, community-based intervention, implementation evaluation
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Chronic Disease, Clinical Protocols, Emergency Service, Hospital, Environment, Female, Health Promotion, Health Services, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Social Support, Cohort Studies, Disease Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review