Cited by 29Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyCentral Venous Catheters and HemodialysisDietetics, Nutrition, and Education

Use of parenteral nutrition in hospitals in the North of England

Open access
Hearnshaw, S. A., Thompson, N. P., the Northern Nutrition Network·2007·Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics

Abstract

Background Parenteral nutrition (PN) is a costly technology used widely to provide nutrition to patients who have an inaccessible or nonfunctioning intestine. A prospective survey was designed to collect data on PN for inpatients to study the current use of PN, its complications and outcomes in the north of England. The study objectives were to use the Northern Nutrition Network to collect data from all acute hospital inpatients prospectively receiving PN, for 3 months and to provide evidence for current PN practice, and to establish whether this is in line with recognized published clinical guidelines. Methods Using a paper-based collection tool information was recorded on aspects of PN including: total inpatient episodes, patient demographics, indications, duration, venous access used, complications, number returning to enteral feeding and mortality. The presence of a nutrition support team was also recorded. Results Data on 193 patient PN episodes were recorded totalling 1708 patient days. The median age of the patients was 67 years. Of these, 158 (82%) were deemed to have a clear indication for PN using the indications cited in the NICE guidelines (http://www.nice.org.uk). The median duration of PN was 7 days (range 1-93). Thirty (16%) patients developed complications due to PN, 23 (12%) had catheter infections which were most common on medical wards. Thirty-nine (20%) patients died within 28 days of PN starting; no deaths were attributable to PN. A total of 118 (61%) pat…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-277x.2007.00742.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies have documented that parenteral nutrition is a feasible and successful method of nutritional support also in older people, not only in the hospital but also at home.

    “Several studies have documented that PN is a feasible and successful method of nutritional support also in older people (130,(178)(179)(180), not only in the hospital but also at home (181).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hearnshaw, S. A., Thompson, N. P., & the Northern Nutrition Network
Affiliations
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • Freeman Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Hearnshaw, S. A.
Venue
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-01-15
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
14-23
ISSN
  • 0952-3871 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-277X
OpenAlex
W2081010631
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Keywords
parenteral nutrition, catheter-related infection, nutrition support team, clinical guideline adherence, NICE guidelines, Northern England
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Catheterization, England, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parenteral Nutrition, Patient Care Team, Quality of Health Care, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Patient Selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review