Cited by 238Celiac Disease Research and ManagementConsumer Attitudes and Food LabelingFood composition and properties

Limited availability and higher cost of gluten‐free foods

Singh, J., Whelan, K.·2011·Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics

Abstract

Background A gluten-free diet is the only treatment for patients with coeliac disease, although it can be burdensome to follow and result in inadequate nutrient intake. The cost and availability of a gluten-free diet has been cited as a cause of incomplete dietary compliance; however, this has not been extensively investigated. The aim was to investigate the availability and cost of gluten-free foods across a wide range of stores. Methods The availability and cost of 20 foods (both wheat-based and everyday foods) was surveyed at 30 different stores across five different store categories. For each of the 20 foods, four products were selected (branded gluten-free, cheapest gluten-free, branded standard, cheapest standard) resulting in sampling of up to 80 products in each of the 30 stores. Results In general, there was limited availability of gluten-free foods, with an average of 8.2 of the 20 (41%) foods being available in a gluten-free version per store. Regular supermarkets had a greater availability (18.0/20, 90%), whereas budget supermarkets (1.8/20, 9%) and corner shops (1.8/20, 9%) had almost no gluten-free versions (P Conclusions There is limited availability of gluten-free foods and they are generally more expensive than their standard counterparts. This may impact on compliance to a gluten-free diet, with potential nutritional and clinical consequences, together with an increased risk of complications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-277x.2011.01160.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, J., & Whelan, K.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Whelan, K.
Venue
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-05-24
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
479-486
ISSN
  • 0952-3871 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-277X
OpenAlex
W1787910161
Cited by
238
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
11.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
Keywords
gluten-free foods, celiac disease, gluten-free diet compliance, food availability, food costs, corner shops, wheat-based foods, everyday food, dietary adherence
MeSH terms
Celiac Disease, Costs and Cost Analysis, Food, Food Supply, Humans, North America, Patient Compliance, Triticum, Diet, Gluten-Free

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review