Cited by 129Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchBehavioral and Psychological StudiesAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

A survey of aggressive behaviour among a population of persons with intellectual disability in Queensland

SJGAFOOS, J., ELKINS, J., KERR, M., ATTWOOD, T.·1994·Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

Abstract

A survey was conducted on aggressive behaviour within a population of 2412 persons with intellectual disability in Queensland, Australia. Two hundred and sixty-one individuals were identified who engaged in at least one form of aggressive behaviour, yielding an overall prevalence of 11%. The relative prevalence of aggressive behaviour was higher among institutionalized persons (35%) when compared to those living in group homes (17%) or other community-based facilities (3%). The aggressive behaviour sample included a higher percentage of males (64%). Most were described as functioning in the severe/profound (54%) or moderate (31%) range of intellectual disability with one-third having no intelligible speech. Two-thirds of the sample received medication for their challenging behaviour, while only one-third had behavioural programmes. Eighty per cent engaged in three or more forms of aggression. Many also displayed self-injury (34%) or property destruction (30%). Surveys of aggressive behaviour may prove useful for coordinating services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1994.tb00417.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SJGAFOOS, J., ELKINS, J., KERR, M., & ATTWOOD, T.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Queensland Government (AU)
Corresponding author
SJGAFOOS, J.
Venue
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-08
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
369-381
ISSN
  • 0964-2633 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2788
OpenAlex
W2095988251
Cited by
129
References
28
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Intellectual Disability Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
aggression, intellectual disability, prevalence, institutionalized persons, group homes, community-based services, behavioral problems, self-harm, property damage, sex differences, Queensland
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aggression, Behavior Therapy, Child, Female, Humans, Institutionalization, Intelligence, Male, Intellectual Disability, Middle Aged, Queensland, Risk Factors, Social Adjustment, Social Environment, Stereotyped Behavior, Group Homes, Self-Injurious Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review