CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 190Behavioral and Psychological StudiesDown syndrome and intellectual disability researchAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The form and function of challenging behaviours

Emerson, E., Bromley, J.·1995·Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1995.tb00543.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Aspects of the topography and behavioural function underlying the challenging behaviours of all people with learning disabilities and challenging behaviour (n = 70) in a defined geographical area were investigated. Results indicated that: (1) more severe challenging behaviours were shown by people with more severe disabilities; (2) a significant minority (44%) of people showed more than one form of challenging behaviour, this rising to 79% among people with more severe challenging behaviours; and (3) cross-sectional analyses revealed specific clusters of problematic, aggressive and self-injurious behaviours. Analysis of information derived from the Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS) indicated that (5) the most common functions of challenging behaviours appeared to be 'self-stimulation' (for self-injury, destructiveness and 'other' challenging behaviours) and securing the attention of carers (for aggressive behaviours). However, (6) parametric analyses failed to identify any consistent relationships between the form and function of an individual's challenging behaviour for aggressive, destructiveness and 'other' challenging behaviours, but (7) clients with self-injurious behaviour were significantly more likely to score highly on the 'self-stimulation' sub-scale than other sub-scales of the MAS. Finally, (8) significant consistency of behavioural functions across different forms of challenging behaviours shown by the same individual were found for the two combinations of aggressive-destructive behaviours and self-injury-'other' behaviours.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1995.tb00543.x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bromley J., 1993, Rising to the Challenge? Needs and Responses to People viith Learning Disabilities and Challenging Behaviours
  2. Carr E. G., 1990, Perspectives on the Use of Nonaversivc and Aversive Intervemions for Persons with Developmental Disabilities, 361
  3. Iwata B. A., 1990, Perspectives on the Use of Nonaversive andAversive Interventions for Persons with Developmental Disabilities, 301
  4. Meyer L., 1989, Nonaversive Interentionfor Behavior Probletns: A Manual for Home and Community
  5. Murphy G., 1993, Severe Learning Disabilities and Challenging Behaviours: Designing High Quality Service, 37

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 190

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Emerson, E., & Bromley, J.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Emerson, E.
ORCID
Emerson, E.
Venue
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-10
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
388-398
ISSN
  • 0964-2633 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2788
DOI
10.1111/j.1365-2788.1995.tb00543.x
OpenAlex
W2024405530
Cited by
190
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 4654 d)
Locations
  • Journal of Intellectual Disability Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
behavioral problems, learning disabilities, self-harm, aggression, destructive behavior, self-stimulation, attention seeking, Motivation Assessment Scale, disability severity
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Aggression, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, England, Female, Humans, Male, Intellectual Disability, Middle Aged, Personality Assessment, Self Stimulation, Social Behavior Disorders, Social Environment, Comorbidity, Incidence, Self-Injurious Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review