The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The form and function of challenging behaviours
Abstract
Aspects of the topography and behavioural function underlying the challenging behaviours of all people with learning disabilities and challenging behaviour (n = 70) in a defined geographical area were investigated. Results indicated that: (1) more severe challenging behaviours were shown by people with more severe disabilities; (2) a significant minority (44%) of people showed more than one form of challenging behaviour, this rising to 79% among people with more severe challenging behaviours; and (3) cross-sectional analyses revealed specific clusters of problematic, aggressive and self-injurious behaviours. Analysis of information derived from the Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS) indicated that (5) the most common functions of challenging behaviours appeared to be 'self-stimulation' (for self-injury, destructiveness and 'other' challenging behaviours) and securing the attention of carers (for aggressive behaviours). However, (6) parametric analyses failed to identify any consistent relationships between the form and function of an individual's challenging behaviour for aggressive, destructiveness and 'other' challenging behaviours, but (7) clients with self-injurious behaviour were significantly more likely to score highly on the 'self-stimulation' sub-scale than other sub-scales of the MAS. Finally, (8) significant consistency of behavioural functions across different forms of challenging behaviours shown by the same individual were found for the two combinations of aggressive-destructive behaviours and self-injury-'other' behaviours.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Communication impairments constitute an important individual risk factor (22, 23) alongside insufficient adaptive problem-solving, and self-help abilities (24), sensory hypersensitivities (4), self-stimulation (3), physical discomfort or pain (25), symptom severity (26), comorbid psychiatric disorders (27), or intense need for care (14).”
Citations
Cites
REDUCING BEHAVIOR PROBLEMS THROUGH FUNCTIONAL COMMUNICATION TRAINING
Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1985.18-111 · Cited by 2,162
Toward a functional analysis of self-injury
Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1982) · Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/0270-4684(82)90003-9 · Cited by 1,092
Identifying the variables maintaining self-injurious behavior
Durand, V. M., & Crimmins, D. (1988) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/bf02211821 · Cited by 650
Analyzing Quantitative Behavioral Observation Data.
LaVange, L. M., Suen, H. K., & Ary, D. (1990) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289578 · Cited by 393
BASING THE TREATMENT OF STEREOTYPIC AND SELF‐INJURIOUS BEHAVIORS ON HYPOTHESES OF THEIR CAUSES
Repp, A. C., Felce, D., & Barton, L. E. (1988) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1988.21-281 · Cited by 337
EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS AND EXTINCTION OF SELF‐INJURIOUS ESCAPE BEHAVIOR
Iwata, B. A., Pace, G. M., Kalsher, M. J., Cowdery, G. E., & Cataldo, M. F. (1990) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1990.23-11 · Cited by 319
Functional Analysis of Problem Behavior: A Practical Assessment Guide
O’Neill, R., Horner, R. H., Albin, R. W., Storey, K., & Sprague, J. R. (1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 310
Handleman, J. S. (1992) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/bf01046411 · Cited by 305
AN ANALYSIS OF MAINTENANCE FOLLOWING FUNCTIONAL COMMUNICATION TRAINING
Durand, V. M., & Carr, E. G. (1992) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1992.25-777 · Cited by 214
Reliability analysis of the motivation assessment scale: A failure to replicate
Zarcone, J. R., Rodgers, T. A., Iwata, B. A., Rourke, D. A., & Dorsey, M. F. (1991) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/0891-4222(91)90031-m · Cited by 200
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Bromley J., 1993, Rising to the Challenge? Needs and Responses to People viith Learning Disabilities and Challenging Behaviours
- Carr E. G., 1990, Perspectives on the Use of Nonaversivc and Aversive Intervemions for Persons with Developmental Disabilities, 361
- Iwata B. A., 1990, Perspectives on the Use of Nonaversive andAversive Interventions for Persons with Developmental Disabilities, 301
- Meyer L., 1989, Nonaversive Interentionfor Behavior Probletns: A Manual for Home and Community
- Murphy G., 1993, Severe Learning Disabilities and Challenging Behaviours: Designing High Quality Service, 37
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The prevalence of challenging behaviors: a total population study
Emerson, E., Kiernan, C., Alborz, A., Reeves, D., Mason, H., Swarbrick, R., Mason, L., & Hatton, C. (2001) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/s0891-4222(00)00061-5 · Cited by 700
Self-citationHolden, B., & Gitlesen, J. P. (2005) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2005.06.001 · Cited by 367
Challenging behaviours: prevalence and topographies
Lowe, K., Allen, D. G., Jones, E. C., Brophy, S., Moore, K., & James, W. (2007) · Journal of Intellectual Disability Research · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00948.x · Cited by 356
Practitioner Review: Psychological and Educational Treatments for Autism
Howlin, P. (1998) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1017/s0021963097002138 · Cited by 290
Matson, J. L., & Neal, D. (2008) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2008.08.007 · Cited by 219
Metadata
- Authors
- Emerson, E., & Bromley, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Emerson, E.
- ORCID
- Emerson, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 388-398
- ISSN
- 0964-2633 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2788
- OpenAlex
- W2024405530
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 6.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Intellectual Disability Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Keywords
- behavioral problems, learning disabilities, self-harm, aggression, destructive behavior, self-stimulation, attention seeking, Motivation Assessment Scale, disability severity
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Aggression, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, England, Female, Humans, Male, Intellectual Disability, Middle Aged, Personality Assessment, Self Stimulation, Social Behavior Disorders, Social Environment, Comorbidity, Incidence, Self-Injurious Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review