Cited by 33Disability Rights and RepresentationDown syndrome and intellectual disability researchFamily and Disability Support Research

Health advocacy: a vital step in attaining human rights for adults with intellectual disability

Brolan, C. E., Boyle, F. M., Dean, J. H., Taylor Gomez, M., Ware, R. S., Lennox, N. G.·2012·Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

Abstract

Background: People with intellectual disability (ID) experience health inequity compared with the general population, a key contributing factor being disparities in social determinants of health. The enactment of the U nited N ations C onvention on the R ights of P ersons with D isabilities (CRPD) provides a platform for the progression and promotion of health and other interconnected rights to address barriers to the highest attainable standard of health for this populace. Rights can be brought to life through advocacy efforts. This paper explores the meaning, perceptions and experiences of advocacy by family members and paid support workers of adults with ID and locates the findings within a health and human rights discourse. Methods: As part of a larger randomised controlled trial, 113 parents and 84 support workers of adults with ID completed a telephone interview that included open‐ended questions about their understanding and experiences of advocacy. Thematic analysis was used to identify relevant themes. Results: Five key themes were identified. The first underscored how advocacy to ‘speak up’ for the person with ID is integral to both parent and support worker roles. The second and third themes considered the contexts for advocacy efforts. Access to quality health care was a core concern, along with advocacy across other areas and sectors to address the person's wider psychosocial needs. The remaining themes highlighted the many dimensions to advocacy, including differences between parent and support worker views, with parental advocacy being an expression of ‘caring’ and support workers motivated by a ‘duty of care’ to protect the individual's ‘rights’. Conclusion: Parent and support worker advocacy provides one means to address the social determinants of health and fulfilment of health rights of and for people with ID. Policy and practice in the context of governmental obligation under the CRPD should support advocacy and make health rights the reality not rhetoric for this group of men and women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01637.x

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Brolan, C. E., Boyle, F. M., Dean, J. H., Taylor Gomez, M., Ware, R. S., & Lennox, N. G.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Queensland Centre for Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities School of Medicine University of Queensland South Brisbane Qld Australia
Corresponding author
Brolan, C. E.
Venue
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-10-29
Volume
56
Issue
11
Pages
1087-1097
ISSN
  • 0964-2633 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2788
OpenAlex
W1830137171
Cited by
33
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Intellectual Disability Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
health advocacy, intellectual disability, human rights, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, social determinants of health, health disparities, health care access, duty of care, right to health
MeSH terms
Adult, Communication, Community Participation, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Human Rights, Interviews as Topic, Male, Intellectual Disability, Parents, Patient Advocacy, Social Support, Social Values, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review