Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 611

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A longitudinal study of orthopaedic outcomes for severe factor‐VIII‐deficient haemophiliacs

ALEDORT, L. M., HASCHMEYER, R. H., PETTERSSON, H., THE ORTHOPAEDIC OUTCOME STUDY GROUP·1994·Journal of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Abstract. Objective. Arthropathy is the major cause of morbidity in haemophilia. In an attempt to establish optimal therapeutic regimens for persons with haemophilia, we hypothesized that no direct relationship exists between increasing factor dosage and orthopaedic outcomes over time. Design. A longitudinal uncontrolled 6 year study was carried out. Ankles, knees and elbows of patients were studied using physical and X‐ray examination scores. Bleeding episodes and treatment regimens were determined. The amount of time lost from work and school, as well as days in hospital, was also monitored. Setting. Twenty‐one international haemophilia centres were used to accrue and follow patients over the 6 year period. Subject. Severe (< 1 %) factor VIII deficient patients under the age of 25 without inhibitors were recruited into the study. Intervention. The status of the six major joints of these patients were measured annually for mobility. X‐ray evaluation of these joints was carried out at the beginning and end of the study. Using a World Federation of Haemophilia joint and X‐ray score, stability, progression or regression of arthropathy was evaluated. Results. Physical and X‐ray examination scores increased significantly with age, and the number of joint bleeds were significant in determining the Δ score. Approximately 10% of patients entered with all six joints normal. Of these, 50% remained so. Year‐long prophylaxis significantly reduced the rate at which joints deteriorate both on physical (P = 0.02) and X‐ray examination (P = < 0.001). Patients on prophylaxis had significantly fewer days lost from work or school, as well as fewer days spent in hospital (P = < 0.01). Conclusions. Higher doses of factor per se do not necessarily produce improved orthopaedic outcomes. However, full time prophylaxis is likely to produce the best orthopaedic outcome. The most critical factor for a good orthopaedic outcome is the reduction of joint bleeds.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1994.tb00815.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 611

Metadata

Authors
ALEDORT, L. M., HASCHMEYER, R. H., PETTERSSON, H., & THE ORTHOPAEDIC OUTCOME STUDY GROUP
Venue
Journal of Internal Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-10
Volume
236
Issue
4
Pages
391-399
ISSN
  • 0954-6820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2796
OpenAlex
W2030561522
Cited by
611
References
0
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A longitudinal study of orthopaedic outcomes for severe factor‐VIII‐deficient haemophiliacs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2796.1994.tb00815.x
The paper
ALEDORT, L. M., HASCHMEYER, R. H., PETTERSSON, H., & THE ORTHOPAEDIC OUTCOME STUDY GROUP. (1994). A longitudinal study of orthopaedic outcomes for severe factor‐VIII‐deficient haemophiliacs. Journal of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.1994.tb00815.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.