The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A randomized comparison of two prophylaxis regimens and a paired comparison of on‐demand and prophylaxis treatments in hemophilia A management
Open accessAbstract
Summary. Background: Prophylaxis with factor (F)VIII is considered the optimal treatment for managing hemophilia A patients without inhibitors. Objectives: To compare the efficacy of two prophylaxis regimens (primary outcome) and of on‐demand and prophylaxis treatments (secondary outcome), and to continue the evaluation of immunogenicity and overall safety of the ADVATE Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant), Plasma/Albumin Free Method (rAHF‐PFM). Patients/Methods: Previously on‐demand‐treated patients aged 7–59 years (n = 66) with FVIII levels ≤ 2% received 6 months of on‐demand treatment and then were randomized to 12 months of either standard (20–40 IU kg−1 every other day) or pharmacokinetic (PK)‐tailored (20–80 IU kg−1 every third day) prophylaxis, both regimens intended to maintain FVIII trough levels at or above 1%. Efficacy was evaluated in terms of annualized bleeding rates (ABRs). As subjects were first treated on‐demand and then on prophylaxis, statistical comparisons between these treatments were paired. Results: Twenty‐two (33.3%) subjects on prophylaxis experienced no bleeding episodes, whereas none treated on‐demand were free from an episode of bleeding. ABRs for the two prophylaxis regimens were comparable, whereas differences between on‐demand and either prophylaxis were statistically significant (P < 0.0001): median (interquartile range [IQR]) ABRs were 43.9 (21.9), 1.0 (3.5), 2.0 (6.9) and 1.1 (4.9) during on‐demand treatment, standard, PK‐tailored and any prophylaxis, respectively. There were no differences in FVIII consumption or adverse event rates between prophylaxis regimens. No subject developed FVIII inhibitors. Conclusions: The present study demonstrates comparable safety and effectiveness for two prophylaxis regimens and that prophylaxis significantly reduces bleeding compared with on‐demand treatment. PK‐tailored prophylaxis offers an alternative to standard prophylaxis for the prevention of bleeding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prophylaxis versus episodic treatment to prevent joint disease in boys with severe hemophilia
Manco-Johnson, M. J., Abshire, T. C., Shapiro, A. D., Riske, B., Hacker, M. R., Kilcoyne, R., Ingram, J. D., Manco-Johnson, M. L., Funk, S., Jacobson, L., et al. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa067659 · Cited by 1,950
Self-citationUser’s manual for the SF-12v2 health survey
Ware, J., Kosinski, M., Bowker, D., Gandek, B., Ware, J. E., & Turner‐Bowker, D. M. (2002) · Cited by 1,085
Twenty‐five years' experience of prophylactic treatment in severe haemophilia A and B
NILSSON, I. M., BERNTORP, E., LÖFQVIST, T., & PETTERSSON, H. (1992) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2796.1992.tb00546.x · Cited by 961
Verbruggen, B., Novakova, I., Wessels, H., Boezeman, J., van den Berg, M., & Mauser-Bunschoten, E. (1995) · Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1653759 · Cited by 652
A longitudinal study of orthopaedic outcomes for severe factor‐VIII‐deficient haemophiliacs
ALEDORT, L. M., HASCHMEYER, R. H., PETTERSSON, H., & THE ORTHOPAEDIC OUTCOME STUDY GROUP (1994) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2796.1994.tb00815.x · Cited by 611
Gouw, S. C., van der Bom, J. G., & Marijke van den Berg, H. (2007) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2006-11-056291 · Cited by 495
A randomized clinical trial of prophylaxis in children with hemophilia A (the ESPRIT Study)
GRINGERI, A., LUNDIN, B., VON MACKENSEN, S., MANTOVANI, L., & MANNUCCI, P. M. (2011) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04214.x · Cited by 454
Haemophilia prophylaxis in young patients–a long‐term follow‐up
LÖFQVIST, T., NILSSON, I. M., BERNTORP, E., & PETTERSSON, H. (1997) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2796.1997.130135000.x · Cited by 332
Collins, P. W., Blanchette, V. S., Fischer, K., Björkman, S., Oh, M., Fritsch, S., Schroth, P., Spotts, G., Astermark, J., & Ewenstein, B. (2009) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.03270.x · Cited by 323
Self-citationBarriers to compliance with prophylaxis therapy in haemophilia
Hacker, M. R., Geraghty, S., & Manco-Johnson, M. (2001) · Haemophilia · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2516.2001.00534.x · Cited by 261
Cited by
Manco-Johnson, M. J., Soucie, J. M., & Gill, J. C. (2017) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2016-02-683169 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Authors
- VALENTINO, L. A., MAMONOV, V., HELLMANN, A., QUON, D. V., CHYBICKA, A., SCHROTH, P., PATRONE, L., & WONG, W. ‐.
- Venue
- Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 359-367
- ISSN
- 1538-7836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1566919421
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 10.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A randomized comparison of two prophylaxis regimens and a paired comparison of on‐demand and prophylaxis treatments in hemophilia A management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04611.x
- The paper
- VALENTINO, L. A., MAMONOV, V., HELLMANN, A., QUON, D. V., CHYBICKA, A., SCHROTH, P., PATRONE, L., & WONG, W. ‐. (2012). A randomized comparison of two prophylaxis regimens and a paired comparison of on‐demand and prophylaxis treatments in hemophilia A management. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04611.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.