Cited by 508Global Cancer Incidence and ScreeningStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management

Interpreting trends in cancer patient survival

DICKMAN, P. W., ADAMI, H.‐O.·2006·Journal of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Data on cancer patient survival are an invaluable tool in the evaluation of therapeutic progress against cancer as well as other lethal diseases. As with all quantitative information routinely used in evidence‐based clinical management – including diagnostic tests, prognostic markers and comparisons of therapeutic interventions – data on patient survival require evaluation based on an understanding of the underlying statistical methodology, methods of data collection and classification, and, most notably, clinical and biologic insight. This article contains an introduction to the methods used for estimating cancer patient survival, including cause‐specific survival, relative survival and period analysis. The methods, and their interpretation, are illustrated through presentation of trends in incidence, mortality and patient survival for a range of different cancers. Our aim was to lay out the strengths and limitations of survival analysis as a tool in the evaluation of progress in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01677.x

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DICKMAN, P. W., & ADAMI, H. ‐.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
DICKMAN, P. W.
Venue
Journal of Internal Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-07-14
Volume
260
Issue
2
Pages
103-117
ISSN
  • 0954-6820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2796
OpenAlex
W1964915268
Cited by
508
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 135 · 2012: 55
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
Keywords
cancer survival, survival trends, cause-specific survival, relative survival, period analysis, cancer incidence, cancer mortality, cancer treatment evaluation
MeSH terms
Data Collection, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Mass Screening, Neoplasms, Incidence, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review