Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 534

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

AN ELECTRON MICROSCOPE STUDY*

Gatenby, J. Brontë, Tahmisian, T. N.·1957·Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society

Abstract

SYNOPSIS: In the fresh water and marine sponges, the Golgi apparatus in the collar cells in each type is differently arranged. In the former there are contractile vacuoles which have no direct connection with the Golgi apparatus; in the latter there are apparently non‐contractile bound vacuoles surrounded by a lamel‐lated osmiophile material; the vacuoles presumably form a water reserve. In the amœbocytes of both types of sponges, the Golgi apparatus is in the form of dictyosomes flattened against the nuclear membrane, and in fresh water sponges these dictyosomes have no direct connection with contractile vacuoles.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1957.tb02020.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 534

Metadata

Authors
Gatenby, J. B., & Tahmisian, T. N.
Venue
Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1957-09-12
Volume
77
Issue
3-4
Pages
107-115
ISSN
0368-3974 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057584203
Cited by
534
References
0
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AN ELECTRON MICROSCOPE STUDY*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1957.tb02020.x
The paper
Gatenby, J. B., & Tahmisian, T. N. (1957). AN ELECTRON MICROSCOPE STUDY*. Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1957.tb02020.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.