Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,519

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The unbiased estimation of number and sizes of arbitrary particles using the disector

Sterio, D. C.·1984·Journal of Microscopy

Abstract

SUMMARY: A three‐dimensional counting rule and its integral test system, the disector, for obtaining unbiased estimates of the number of arbitrary particles in a specimen is presented. Used in combination with ordinary and recently developed stereological methods unbiased estimates of various mean particle sizes and the variance of particle volume are obtainable on sets of two parallel sections with a known separation. The same principle allows the unbiased estimation of the distribution of individual particle volumes in sets of serial sections.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1984.tb02501.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2,519

Metadata

Authors
Sterio, D. C.
Venue
Journal of Microscopy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1984-05
Volume
134
Issue
2
Pages
127-136
ISSN
  • 0022-2720 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2818
OpenAlex
W2106875648
Cited by
2,519
References
0
FWCI
27.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The unbiased estimation of number and sizes of arbitrary particles using the disector. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1984.tb02501.x
The paper
Sterio, D. C. (1984). The unbiased estimation of number and sizes of arbitrary particles using the disector. Journal of Microscopy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1984.tb02501.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.