The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measurement of co‐localization of objects in dual‐colour confocal images
Abstract
SUMMARY: A method to measure the degree of co‐localization of objects in confocal dual‐colour images has been developed. This image analysis produced two coefficients that represent the fraction of co‐localizing objects in each component of a dual‐channel image. The generation of test objects with a Gaussian intensity distribution, at well‐defined positions in both components of dual‐channel images, allowed an accurate investigation of the reliability of the procedure. To do that, the co‐localization coefficients were determined before degrading the image with background, cross‐talk and Poisson noise. These synthesized sources of image deterioration represent sources of deterioration that must be dealt with in practical confocal imaging, namely dark current, non‐specific binding and cross‐reactivity of fluorescent probes, optical cross‐talk and photon noise. The degraded images were restored by filtering and cross‐talk correction. The co‐localization coefficients of the restored images were not significantly different from those of the original undegraded images. Finally, we tested the procedure on images of real biological specimens. The results of these tests correspond with data found in the literature. We conclude that the co‐localization coefficients can provide relevant quantitative information about the positional relation between biological objects or processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- 10.1016/0960-0760(91)90235-W · DOI
- Akner G., 1990, Immunocytochemical localization of glucocorticoid receptor in human gingival fibroblasts and evidence for colocalization of glucocorticoid receptor with cytoplasmic microtubiles, Eur. J. Cell Biol., 53, 390
- 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1990.tb02947.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2818.1990.tb02947.x
- 10.1007/BF01046839 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1990.tb02943.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2818.1990.tb02943.x
- 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1992.tb03216.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2818.1992.tb03216.x
- 10.1002/cyto.990110502 · doi:10.1002/cyto.990110502
- 10.1083/jcb.111.6.2463 · doi:10.1083/jcb.111.6.2463
- 10.1007/BF00482983 · doi:10.1007/bf00482983
- Fox M.H., 1991, Spatial and temporal distribution of DNA replication sites localized by immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy in mouse fibroblast, J. Cell Sci., 99, 247, 10.1242/jcs.99.2.247 · DOI · Paper page
- Gonzalez R.C., 1987, Digital Image Processing
- 10.1002/hep.1840120617 · doi:10.1002/hep.1840120617
- 10.1083/jcb.112.3.385 · DOI
- Manders E.M.M., 1992, Dynamics of three dimensional replication patterns during the S‐phase, analyzed by double labelling of DNA and confocal microscopy, J. Cell. Sci., 103, 857, 10.1242/jcs.103.3.857 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/jemt.1060180110 · doi:10.1002/jemt.1060180110
- 10.1177/38.2.1967620 · doi:10.1177/38.2.1967620
- 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1990.tb02995.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2818.1990.tb02995.x
- 10.1083/jcb.111.4.1713 · DOI · Paper page
- Stamatoglou S.C., 1990, Localisation of two fibronectin‐binding glycoproteins in rat liver primary hepatocytes. Co‐distribution in vitro of integrin (alpha 5 beta 1) and non‐integrin (AGp110) receptors in cell‐substratum adhesion sites, J. Cell Sci., 97, 595, 10.1242/jcs.97.4.595 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-1759(82)90225-3 · doi:10.1016/0022-1759(82)90225-3
Cited by
Mitofusin 2 tethers endoplasmic reticulum to mitochondria
de Brito, O. M., & Scorrano, L. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07534 · Cited by 2,442
Apolipoprotein E promotes astrocyte colocalization and degradation of deposited amyloid-β peptides
Koistinaho, M., Lin, S., Wu, X., Esterman, M., Koger, D., Hanson, J., Higgs, R., Liu, F., Malkani, S., Bales, K. R., et al. (2004) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1058 · Cited by 571
Horton, E. R., Byron, A., Askari, J. A., Ng, D. H. J., Millon-Frémillon, A., Robertson, J., Koper, E. J., Paul, N. R., Warwood, S., Knight, D., et al. (2015) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb3257 · Cited by 543
Elucidation of Exosome Migration Across the Blood–Brain Barrier Model In Vitro
Chen, C. C., Liu, L., Ma, F., Wong, C. W., Guo, X. E., Chacko, J. V., Farhoodi, H. P., Zhang, S. X., Zimak, J., Ségaliny, A., et al. (2016) · Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering · doi:10.1007/s12195-016-0458-3 · Cited by 537
Changes in chromatin structure and mobility in living cells at sites of DNA double-strand breaks
Kruhlak, M. J., Celeste, A., Dellaire, G., Fernandez-Capetillo, O., Müller, W. G., McNally, J. G., Bazett-Jones, D. P., & Nussenzweig, A. (2006) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200510015 · Cited by 518
Metadata
- Authors
- MANDERS, E. M. M., VERBEEK, F. J., & ATEN, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Microscopy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-03
- Volume
- 169
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 375-382
- ISSN
- 0022-2720 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2818
- OpenAlex
- W2022050193
- Cited by
- 2,154
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement of co‐localization of objects in dual‐colour confocal images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1993.tb03313.x
- The paper
- MANDERS, E. M. M., VERBEEK, F. J., & ATEN, J. A. (1993). Measurement of co‐localization of objects in dual‐colour confocal images. Journal of Microscopy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1993.tb03313.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.