The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dynamics of three-dimensional replication patterns during the s-phase, analysed by double labelling of dna and confocal microscopy
Abstract
The temporal and spatial progression of DNA replication in interphase nuclei of eukaryotic cells has been investigated. Application of a recently developed technique for the immunofluorescence double staining of cell nuclei labelled first with iododeoxyuridine (IdUrd) and subsequently with chlorodeoxyuridine (CldUrd) allows the visualization of two replication patterns in the same nucleus originating from two different periods of the S-phase. We have analysed changes in the three-dimensional replication patterns during the S-phase. To record dual colour three-dimensional images of doubly stained nuclei, a confocal microscope is used. This CSLM is equipped with a specific laser/filter combination to collect both fluorescence signals (FITC and Texas Red) in a single scan, thus precluding pixel shift between the images. A method for the quantitative evaluation of the degree of overlap between DNA regions replicated in two different periods of the S-phase is applied. The results confirm the generally accepted theory that DNA is replicated coordinately in a specific temporal order during the S-phase. The replication time of a DNA domain (i.e. the time between initiation and termination of DNA replication within a domain) at the very beginning of the S-phase was known to be one hour (Nakamura et al., 1986). Our observations show that in the rest of the S-phase, the replication time of a DNA region is also about one hour. We conclude that replicon clusters located in the same region are replicated in the same relatively short period of time. After this period there is no unreplicated DNA left in this region.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dompierre, J. P., Godin, J. D., Charrin, B. C., Cordelières, F. P., King, S. J., Humbert, S., & Saudou, F. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0037-07.2007 · Cited by 792
Szado, T., Vanderheyden, V., Parys, J. B., De Smedt, H., Rietdorf, K., Kotelevets, L., Chastre, E., Khan, F., Landegren, U., Söderberg, O., et al. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0711324105 · Cited by 262
Fallini, C., Bassell, G. J., & Rossoll, W. (2012) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/dds205 · Cited by 247
Zona, L., Lupberger, J., Sidahmed-Adrar, N., Thumann, C., Harris, H. J., Barnes, A., Florentin, J., Tawar, R. G., Xiao, F., Turek, M., et al. (2013) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.02.006 · Cited by 182
Tzaban, S., Massol, R. H., Yen, E., Hamman, W., Frank, S. R., Lapierre, L. A., Hansen, S. H., Goldenring, J. R., Blumberg, R. S., & Lencer, W. I. (2009) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200809122 · Cited by 169
Metadata
- Authors
- Manders, E. M. M., Stap, J., Brakenhoff, G. J., Driel, R. V., & Aten, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Science
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1992-11-01
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 857-862
- ISSN
- 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9137
- OpenAlex
- W2108036428
- Cited by
- 739
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamics of three-dimensional replication patterns during the s-phase, analysed by double labelling of dna and confocal microscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.103.3.857
- The paper
- Manders, E. M. M., Stap, J., Brakenhoff, G. J., Driel, R. V., & Aten, J. A. (1992). Dynamics of three-dimensional replication patterns during the s-phase, analysed by double labelling of dna and confocal microscopy. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.103.3.857
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.