The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Aberrations in confocal fluorescence microscopy induced by mismatches in refractive index
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: The effect of refractive‐index mismatch, as encountered in the observation of biological specimens, on the image acquisition process in confocal fluorescence microscopy is investigated theoretically. The analysis takes the vectorial properties of light into account and is valid for high numerical apertures. Quantitative predictions on the decrease of resolution, intensity drop and shift of focus are given for practical situations. When observing with a numerical aperture of 1·3 (oil immersion) and an excitation wavelength of 514 nm the centre of the focus shifts 1·7 μm per 10 μm of axial displacement in an aqueous medium, thus yielding an image that is scaled by a factor of 1·2 in the axial direction. Furthermore, it can be expected that for a fluorescent plane 20 μm deep inside an aqueous medium the peak intensity is 40% less than for a plane which is 10 μm deep. In addition, the axial resolution is decreased by a factor of 1·4. The theory was experimentally verified for test samples with different refractive indices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Xu, C., & Webb, W. W. (1996) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.13.000481 · Cited by 2,198
Fluorescence microscopy with diffraction resolution barrier broken by stimulated emission
Klar, T. A., Jakobs, S., Dyba, M., Egner, A., & Hell, S. W. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.15.8206 · Cited by 1,869
Self-citationRichardson, D. S., & Lichtman, J. W. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.067 · Cited by 1,095
Rajadhyaksha, M., González, S., Zavislan, J. M., Rox Anderson, R., & Webb, R. H. (1999) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1747.1999.00690.x · Cited by 834
Török, P., Varga, P., Laczik, Z., & Booker, G. R. (1995) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.12.000325 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- HELL, S., REINER, G., CREMER, C., & STELZER, E. H. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Microscopy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-03
- Volume
- 169
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 391-405
- ISSN
- 0022-2720 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2818
- OpenAlex
- W2171788130
- Cited by
- 640
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aberrations in confocal fluorescence microscopy induced by mismatches in refractive index. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1993.tb03315.x
- The paper
- HELL, S., REINER, G., CREMER, C., & STELZER, E. H. K. (1993). Aberrations in confocal fluorescence microscopy induced by mismatches in refractive index. Journal of Microscopy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1993.tb03315.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.