Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Unbiased estimation of human body composition by the Cavalieri method using magnetic resonance imaging

ROBERTS, N., CRUZ‐ORIVE, L. M., REID, N. M. K., BRODIE, D. A., BOURNE, M., EDWARDS, R. H. T.·1993·Journal of Microscopy

Abstract

Summary: The classical methods for estimating the volume of human body compartments in vivo (e.g. skin‐fold thickness for fat, radioisotope counting for different compartments, etc.) are generally indirect and rely on essentially empirical relationships — hence they are biased to unknown degrees. The advent of modern non‐invasive scanning techniques, such as X‐ray computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is now widening the scope of volume quantification, especially in combination with stereological methods. Apart from its superior soft tissue contrast, MRI enjoys the distinct advantage of not using ionizing radiations. By a proper landmarking and control of the scanner couch, an adult male volunteer was scanned exhaustively into parallel systematic MR ‘sections’. Four compartments were defined, namely bone, muscle, organs and fat (which included the skin), and their corresponding volumes were easily and efficiently estimated by the Cavalieri method: the total section area of a compartment times the section interval estimates the volume of the compartment without bias. Formulae and nomograms are given to predict the errors and to optimize the design. To estimate an individual's muscle volume with a 5% coefficient of error, 10 sections and less than 10min point counting (to estimate the relevant section areas) are required. Bone and fat require about twice as much work. To estimate the mean muscle volume of a population with the same error contribution, from a random sample of six subjects, the workload per subject can be divided by √6, namely 4 min per subject. For a given number of sections planimetry would be as accurate but far more time consuming than point counting.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1993.tb03381.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 165

Metadata

Authors
ROBERTS, N., CRUZ‐ORIVE, L. M., REID, N. M. K., BRODIE, D. A., BOURNE, M., & EDWARDS, R. H. T.
Venue
Journal of Microscopy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-09
Volume
171
Issue
3
Pages
239-253
ISSN
  • 0022-2720 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2818
OpenAlex
W2062685926
Cited by
165
References
0
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unbiased estimation of human body composition by the Cavalieri method using magnetic resonance imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1993.tb03381.x
The paper
ROBERTS, N., CRUZ‐ORIVE, L. M., REID, N. M. K., BRODIE, D. A., BOURNE, M., & EDWARDS, R. H. T. (1993). Unbiased estimation of human body composition by the Cavalieri method using magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Microscopy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1993.tb03381.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.