Cited by 248Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesDigital Holography and MicroscopyAdaptive optics and wavefront sensing

Aberration correction for confocal imaging in refractive‐index‐mismatched media

Booth, M.J., Neil, M.A.A., Wilson, T.·1998·Journal of Microscopy

Abstract

Summary: A major limitation to the use of confocal microscopes to image thick biological tissue lies in the dramatic reduction in both signal level and resolution when focusing deep into a refractive‐index‐mismatched specimen. This limitation may be overcome by measuring the wavefront aberration and pre‐shaping the input beam so as to cancel the effects of aberration. We consider the images of planar and point objects in brightfield, single‐photon fluorescence and two‐photon fluorescence imaging. In all cases, the specimens are imaged using an oil‐immersion objective through various thicknesses of water. The question of finite‐sized pinhole is addressed and it is found, in general, that it is sufficient to correct only the first two or three orders of spherical aberration to restore adequate image signal level and optical resolution, at imaging depths of up to 50‐100 wavelengths.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1998.99999.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A detection numerical aperture (NA) of 0.6 is used; lower NA values do not sufficiently resolve signals from adjacent voxels, whereas higher NA values introduce more significant spherical aberration with depth.

    “A detection numerical aperture (NA) of 0.6 is used; lower NA values do not sufficiently resolve signals from adjacent voxels, whereas higher NA values introduce more significant spherical aberration with depth34–36.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Booth, M. J., Neil, M. A. A., & Wilson, T.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Journal of Microscopy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-11
Volume
192
Issue
2
Pages
90-98
ISSN
  • 0022-2720 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2818
OpenAlex
W2083793763
Cited by
248
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Microscopy (publishedVersion)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Digital Holography and Microscopy
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Keywords
aberration correction, confocal microscopy, refractive index mismatch, wavefront aberrations, spherical aberration, two-photon fluorescence, single-photon fluorescence, oil immersion objective, water immersion, pinhole size, image depth, optical resolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review