Cited by 211

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Freeze substitution in 3 hours or less: FREEZE SUBSTIUTION IN 3 HOURS OR LESS

McDONALD, K.L., WEBB, R.I.·2011·Journal of Microscopy

Abstract

Freeze substitution is a process for low temperature dehydration and fixation of rapidly frozen cells that usually takes days to complete. New methods for freeze substitution have been developed that require only basic laboratory tools: a platform shaker, liquid nitrogen, a metal block with holes for cryotubes and an insulated container such as an ice bucket. With this equipment, excellent freeze substitution results can be obtained in as little as 90 min for cells of small volume such as bacteria and tissue culture cells. For cells of greater volume or that have significant diffusion barriers such as cuticles or thick cell walls, one can extend the time to 3 h or more with dry ice. The 3-h method works well for all manner of specimens, including plants and Caenorhabditis elegans as well as smaller samples. Here, we present the basics of the techniques and some results from Nicotiana leaves, C. elegans adult worms, Escherichia coli and baby hamster kidney tissue culture cells.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2011.03526.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Austin, 2011, Three-dimensional architecture of grana and stroma thylakoids of higher plants as determined by electron tomography, Plant Physiol, 155, 1601, 10.1104/pp.110.170647 · DOI
  2. Buser, 2008, Freeze substitution: the addition of water to polar solvents enhances the retention of structure and acts at temperatures around -60°C, J. Microsc, 230, 268, 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2008.01984.x · DOI
  3. Dubochet, 2007, The physics of rapid cooling and its implications for cryoimmobilization of cells, Methods Cell Biol, 79, 7, 10.1016/S0091-679X(06)79001-X · DOI
  4. Giddings, 2003, Freeze-substitution protocols for improved visualization of membranes in high-pressure frozen samples, J. Microsc, 212, 53, 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2003.01228.x · DOI
  5. Hansen, 2010, Improved preservation of HeLa cells by sequential chemical addition during microwave-assisted freeze substitution, Microsc. Microanal, 16, 978, 10.1017/S143192761005765X · DOI
  6. Hawes, 2007, Rapid freeze-substitution preserves membranes in high-pressure frozen tissue culture cells, J. Microsc., 226, 182, 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2007.01767.x · DOI
  7. Hess, 2007, Cryopreparation methodology for plant cell biology, Methods Cell Biol, 79, 57, 10.1016/S0091-679X(06)79003-3 · DOI
  8. Humbel, 2009, Handbook of Cryo-Preparation Methods for Electron Microscopy, 319
  9. Humbel, 1986, The Science of Biological Specimen Preparation, 175
  10. Leunissen, 2009, Self-pressurized rapid freezing (SPRF): a novel cryofixation method for specimen preparation in electron microscopy, J. Microsc., 235, 25, 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2009.03178.x · DOI
  11. McDonald, 1999, High-pressure freezing for preservation of high resolution fine structure and antigenicity for immunolabeling, Methods Mol. Biol., 117, 77
  12. McDonald, 2007, Cryopreparation methods for electron microscopy of selected model systems, Methods Cell Biol., 79, 23, 10.1016/S0091-679X(06)79002-1 · DOI
  13. Möbius, 2009, Cryopreparation of biological specimens for immunoelectron microscopy, Ann. Anat., 191, 231, 10.1016/j.aanat.2008.11.004 · DOI
  14. Moor, 1987, Cryotechniques in Biological Electron Microscopy, 175, 10.1007/978-3-642-72815-0_8 · DOI
  15. Ornberg, 1981, Microprobe Analysis of Biological Systems, 213, 10.1016/B978-0-12-362880-0.50018-1 · DOI
  16. Segui-Simarro, 2004, Electron tomographic analysis of somatic cell plate formation in meristematic cells of Nicotiana preserved by high pressure freezing, Plant Cell., 16, 836, 10.1105/tpc.017749 · DOI
  17. Steinbrecht, 1982, Experiments on freezing damage with freeze substitution using moth antennae as test objects, J. Microsc, 125, 187, 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1982.tb00336.x · DOI
  18. Steinbrecht, 1985, Recrystallization and ice-crystal growth in a biological specimen, as shown by a simple freeze substitution method, J. Microsc, 140, 41, 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1985.tb02658.x · DOI
  19. Steinbrecht, 1993, Freeze-substitution for morphological and immunocytochemical studies in insects, Microsc. Res. Tech, 24, 488, 10.1002/jemt.1070240605 · DOI
  20. Vanhecke, 2008, Close-to-native ultrastructural preservation by high pressure freezing, Methods Cell Biol, 88, 151, 10.1016/S0091-679X(08)00409-3 · DOI
  21. Wang, 2010, EXPO, an exocyst-positive organelle distinct from multivesicular endosomes and autphagosomes, mediates cytosol to cell wall exocytosis in Arabidopsis and tobacco cells, Plant Cell., 22, 4009, 10.1105/tpc.110.080697 · DOI
  22. Zalokar, 1966, A simple freeze-substitution method for electron microscopy, J. Ultrastruct. Res, 15, 469, 10.1016/S0022-5320(66)80119-3 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 211

Metadata

Authors
McDONALD, K. L., & WEBB, R. I.
Venue
Journal of Microscopy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-08-09
Volume
243
Issue
3
Pages
227-233
ISSN
0022-2720
Cited by
211
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review