Cited by 45Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disordersPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

Dreaming and REM sleep

Open access
FOULKES, DAVID·1993·Journal of Sleep Research

Abstract

The discovery, 40 years ago, of REM sleep and of its putative association with dreaming in the adult human raised the possibility that neuroscientific investigations of REM-sleep physiology would someday 'explain' the distinctive features of dream experience. I argue here against the possibility, since replicated psychological data demonstrate that REM sleep is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for dreaming to occur. Dreaming depends, rather, upon the possession of conscious representational intelligence in conjunction with any psychophysiological state in which ideation is being driven neither volitionally nor by external stimulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2869.1993.tb00090.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Foulkes found dream frequency rates of 20% for children younger than 7 years, compared to 80%-90% frequency rate in adults.

    “In a laboratory study, he found dream frequency rates of 20% for children younger than 7 years, as compared to 80%–90% frequency rate in adults.4”

    From Spotlight on dream recall: the ages of dreams (2018) · cites this paper as [4]

    The CHILDREN'S DREAMS section (pp. 2–3) describes laboratory studies and reports that dream reports were scarce in early childhood. It does not give a 20% rate for children under 7; its reference to twenty concerns the number of children studied at each age. The CONCLUSION (p. 3) describes a substantial association between adult REM sleep and dream reporting but gives no 80%–90% rate. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Longer reports, but with still low recall rate, are reached between ages 5 and 7 years.

    “Longer reports, but with still low recall rate, are reached between ages 5 and 7 years.”

    From Spotlight on dream recall: the ages of dreams (2018) · cites this paper as [4]

    The CHILDREN'S DREAMS section (p. 3) reports relatively sparse dream reporting in early childhood, including in a study of children aged 5–8. The discussion on pp. 2–3 describes a stage-like development of dream reports, but does not specifically establish that reports become longer between ages 5 and 7. (LLM, conf=0.81)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Dream content at the age of 2-5 years shows a general absence of people, object, and events, being usually a static report of single characters.

    “Specifically, dream content at the age of 2–5 years shows a general absence of people, object, and events, being usually a static report of single characters.”

    From Spotlight on dream recall: the ages of dreams (2018) · cites this paper as [4]

    The CHILDREN'S DREAMS section (pp. 2–3) describes preschool REM dream reports as scarce and impoverished, and imagery before age 7 as generally static. It does not establish a general absence of people, objects, and events or say that reports usually feature a single character; the studies described also begin at age 3, not 2. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A first real development in dream content is reached at the age of 7 years, when the child starts to represent himself in the dream, with higher emotional content, active participation, and narrative structure, in dreams overall more frequent and longer.

    “A first real development in dream content is reached at the age of 7 years, when the child starts to represent himself in the dream, with higher emotional content, active participation, and narrative structure, in dreams overall more frequent and longer.4,73,89,91”

    From Spotlight on dream recall: the ages of dreams (2018) · cites this paper as [4]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Dream content analysis reveals a full development and adult-like content of dream experience from 9 years of age.

    “At the same time, dream content analysis reveals a full development and adult-like content of dream experience from 9 years of age,4,89,73,91 coherent with mature mental imagery skills.73,92”

    From Spotlight on dream recall: the ages of dreams (2018) · cites this paper as [4]

    The CHILDREN'S DREAMS section (pp. 2–3) describes a stage-like emergence of adult dream properties and reports relatively simple narratives and little active self-participation until age 8. It does not establish that dream experience is fully developed or adult-like from age 9; its conclusion about reaching a mature form is qualified. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Aserinsky, E. and Kleitman, N. Regularly occurring periods of eye motility, and concomitant phenomena, during sleep. Science, 1953, 118: 273–274.
  2. Foulkes, D. 1982 Children's Dreams: Longitudinal studies., Wiley-Interscience. New York.
  3. Foulkes, D. Dreaming and consciousness. E. J. Cog. Psychol., 1990, 2: 39–55.
  4. Foulkes, D., Hollifield, M., Sullivan, B., Bradley, L. and Terry, R. REM dreaming and cognitive skill at ages 5-8: A cross-sectional study. Int. J. Behav. Dev., 1990, 13: 447–465.
  5. Foulkes, D. and Schmidt, M. Temporal sequence and unit composition in dream reports from different stages of sleep. Sleep, 1983, 6: 265–280.
  6. Horne, J. A. Mammalian sleep function with particular reference to man. In: A. Mayes (Ed.) Sleep Mechanisms and Functions in Humans and Animals—an Evolutionary Perspective, Van Nostrand Reinhold, Wokingham, UK, 1983: 262–312.
  7. Nielsen, T. A. One century of dream research. Newsl. Ass. Study of Dreams, 1985, 2(3): 1–3.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
FOULKES, D.
Corresponding author
FOULKES, DAVID
Venue
Journal of Sleep Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-12
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
199-202
ISSN
  • 0962-1105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2869
OpenAlex
W1986532362
Cited by
45
References
4
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Sleep Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
REM sleep, dreams, dream experience, idea generation, volition, external stimulation, sleep physiology, philosophy of mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review