Cited by 306Sleep and Work-Related FatigueCoffee research and impactsSleep and Wakefulness Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Performance and alertness effects of caffeine, dextroamphetamine, and modafinil during sleep deprivation

Abstract

Stimulants may provide short-term performance and alertness enhancement during sleep loss. Caffeine 600 mg, d-amphetamine 20 mg, and modafinil 400 mg were compared during 85 h of total sleep deprivation to determine the extent to which the three agents restored performance on simple psychomotor tasks, objective alertness and tasks of executive functions. Forty-eight healthy young adults remained awake for 85 h. Performance and alertness tests were administered bi-hourly from 8:00 hours day 2 to 19:00 hours day 5. At 23:50 hours on day 4 (after 64 h awake), subjects ingested placebo, caffeine 600 mg, dextroamphetamine 20 mg, or modafinil 400 mg (n=12 per group). Performance and alertness testing continued, and probe tasks of executive function were administered intermittently until the recovery sleep period (20:00 hours day 5 to 8:00 hours day 5). Bi-hourly postrecovery sleep testing occurred from 10:00 hours to 16:00 hours day 6. All three agents improved psychomotor vigilance speed and objectively measured alertness relative to placebo. Drugs did not affect recovery sleep, and postrecovery sleep performance for all drug groups was at presleep deprivation levels. Effects on executive function tasks were mixed, with improvement on some tasks with caffeine and modafinil, and apparent decrements with dextroamphetamine on others. At the doses tested, caffeine, dextroamphetamine, and modafinil are equally effective for approximately 2-4 h in restoring simple psychomotor performanc…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2005.00468.x

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2004.00407.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1207/s15327876mp1003_3 · DOI
  3. 10.1080/01688639608408304 · DOI
  4. Bensimon G., 1991, Antagonism by modafinil of the psychomotor and cognitive impairment induced by sleep‐deprivation in 12 healthy volunteers, Eur. Psychiatry, 6, 93, 10.1017/S0924933800000201 · DOI
  5. Benton A. L., 1989, Multilingual Aphasia Examination
  6. 10.1111/j.1365-2869.1995.tb00173.x · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.acn.2003.12.002 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s002130000450 · DOI
  9. 10.3758/BF03200977 · DOI
  10. 10.1046/j.1365-2869.1998.00104.x · DOI
  11. 10.1006/obhd.1999.2827 · DOI
  12. Hoddes E., 1973, Quantification of sleepiness: a new approach, J. Clin. Psychol., 30, 248
  13. Kamimori G. H., 2004, Efficacy of multiple caffeine doses for maintenance of vigilance during early morning operations, Proc. 24th Annu Army Sci. Conf., JO
  14. Kongs S. K., 2000, The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST‐64): Computer Version 2 Research Edition
  15. 10.1111/j.1472-8206.1995.tb00295.x · DOI
  16. Lezak M. D., 1995, Neuropsychological Assessment
  17. 10.1007/s00213-004-1926-3 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/0893-133X(89)90018-3 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/BF02244933 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1365-2869.1995.tb00172.x · DOI
  21. 10.1002/hup.456 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.pbb.2003.12.016 · DOI
  23. Rechtschaffen A., 1968, A Manual of Standardized Terminology, Techniques, and Scoring Systems for Sleep Stages of Human Subjects
  24. Rosenthal L., 1991, Enforced 24 hr recovery following sleep deprivation, Sleep, 14, 448, 10.1093/sleep/14.5.448 · DOI
  25. Saletu B., 1989, Differential effects of the new central adrenergic agonist modafinil and d‐amphetamine on sleep and early morning behavior in young healthy volunteers, Int. J. Clin. Pharm. Res., 9, 183
  26. 10.1007/s00213-002-1250-8 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/sleep/27.3.434 · DOI
  28. Warot D., 1993, Subjective effects of modafinil, a new central adrenergic stimulant in healthy volunteers: a comparison with amphetamine, caffeine and placebo, Eur. Psychiatry, 8, 201, 10.1017/S0924933800002923 · DOI
  29. 10.1080/1028415031000120543 · DOI
  30. 10.1007/s002130100916 · DOI
  31. 10.1177/00912709922007534 · DOI
  32. 10.1093/sleep/27.3.374 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 306

Metadata

Authors
WESENSTEN, N. J., KILLGORE, W. D. S., & BALKIN, T. J.
Affiliations
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (US)
Corresponding author
WESENSTEN, NANCY J.
Venue
Journal of Sleep Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-08-25
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
255-266
ISSN
  • 0962-1105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2869
OpenAlex
W1975163395
Cited by
306
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 26
FWCI
22.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sleep Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Coffee research and impacts
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
caffeine, d-amphetamine, modafinil, sleep deprivation, stimulants, alertness, psychomotor performance, executive function, psychomotor vigilance, recovery sleep, drug elimination rate
MeSH terms
Modafinil, Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Arousal, Benzhydryl Compounds, Caffeine, Cognition, Dextroamphetamine, Female, Humans, Disorders of Excessive Somnolence, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Sleep Deprivation, Wakefulness, Polysomnography, Dopamine Agonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review