Cited by 114Sleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and Wakefulness ResearchCoffee research and impacts

Effects of Tyrosine, Phentermine, Caffeined-amphetamine, and Placebo on Cognitive and Motor Performance Deficits During Sleep Deprivation

Magill, Richard A., Waters, William F., Bray, George A., Volaufova, Julia, Smith, Steven R., Lieberman, Harris R., McNevin, Nancy, Ryan, Donna H.·2003·Nutritional Neuroscience

Abstract

Cognitive and motor performance are critical in many circumstances and are impaired by sleep deprivation. We administered placebo, tyrosine 150 mg/kg, caffeine 300 mg/70 kg, phentermine 37.5 mg and D-amphetamine 20 mg at 15.30 h following overnight sleep deprivation and compare their effects on cognitive and motor performance in healthy young men. Tests of visual scanning, running memory, logical reasoning, mathematical processing, the Stroop task, four-choice serial reaction time, time wall take, pursuit tracking, visual vigilance, Trails (B) task and long-term memory were evaluated at standardized intervals before, during and after sleep deprivation and drugs. Performance decrements with sleep deprivation occurred in visual scanning, running memory, logical reasoning, mathematical processing, the Stroop test, the time wall test, tracking and visual vigilance. Interestingly, with sleep deprivation some tests improved and others did not deteriorate. Improvements with medication following sleep deprivation were seen in running memory, logical reasoning, mathematical processing, tracking and visual vigilance. Although less effective than D-amphetamine, tyrosine improved performance on several tests. We conclude that all drugs tested improved at least some aspects of cognitive and motor performance after sleep deprivation. As a naturally occurring amino acid, and thus amenable to nutritional strategies, tyrosine may deserve further testing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1028415031000120552

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Magill, R. A., Waters, W. F., Bray, G. A., Volaufova, J., Smith, S. R., Lieberman, H. R., McNevin, N., & Ryan, D. H.
Affiliations
Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
Venue
Nutritional Neuroscience
Published
2003-01
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
237-246
ISSN
  • 1028-415X (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8305
OpenAlex
W1999076139
Cited by
114
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
10.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutritional Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
Keywords
sleep deprivation, tyrosine, phentermine, caffeine, d-amphetamine, cognitive performance, motor performance, visual vigilance, Stroop task, serial reaction time, long-term memory, amino acid supplementation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Caffeine, Cognition, Dextroamphetamine, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Male, Motor Activity, Phentermine, Placebos, Sleep Deprivation, Tyrosine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review