The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Expert opinion on the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C
Open accessAbstract
Summary. The current preferred treatment for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is combination therapy consisting of pegylated interferon alfa and ribavirin (RBV) for 24–48 weeks. Although this approach appears to be highly effective for patients with HCV genotypes 2 or 3, who have a sustained virological response (SVR) of approximately 80%, the treatment algorithm is less effective for patients with HCV genotype 1, as these patients have SVR rates of just 40–50%. In order to improve treatment outcomes, this article explores potential approaches for the optimization of treatment for patients with HCV genotype 1: considering shorter treatment periods for patients with a rapid virological response (RVR), increasing treatment periods for slow responders, and increasing RBV dose are all suggestions. Results from clinical trials suggest that approximately 20% of the HCV genotype 1‐infected population are slow responders, and around 15% of all HCV genotype‐1 infected patients could benefit from a shorter treatment duration without compromising the SVR rate. Interest has also focused on whether treatment duration could be individualized in some patients with genotype 2 and 3 infection. Here all the findings from recent studies are translated into practical advice, to help practitioners make evidence‐based treatment decisions in everyday clinical practice. Although there are areas where currently available data do not provide conclusive evidence to suggest amending treatment approaches, there is clearly potential for individualized treatment in all aspects of hepatitis treatment in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hepatitis C virus NS3/4a protease inhibitors
McCauley, J. A., & Rudd, M. T. (2016) · Current Opinion in Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.coph.2016.07.015 · Cited by 120
Protease inhibitor therapy for hepatitis C virus-infection
de Leuw, P., & Stephan, C. (2018) · Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1080/14656566.2018.1454428 · Cited by 51
Zoller, H., Schloegl, A., Schroecksnadel, S., Vogel, W., & Fuchs, D. (2012) · Journal of Interferon & Cytokine Research · doi:10.1089/jir.2011.0093 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Zeuzem, S., Berg, T., Moeller, B., Hinrichsen, H., Mauss, S., Wedemeyer, H., Sarrazin, C., Hueppe, D., Zehnter, E., & Manns, M. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Viral Hepatitis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-01-30
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 75-90
- ISSN
- 1352-0504 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2893
- OpenAlex
- W2026067734
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Expert opinion on the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2893.2008.01012.x
- The paper
- Zeuzem, S., Berg, T., Moeller, B., Hinrichsen, H., Mauss, S., Wedemeyer, H., Sarrazin, C., Hueppe, D., Zehnter, E., & Manns, M. P. (2009). Expert opinion on the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Journal of Viral Hepatitis. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2893.2008.01012.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.