Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 242

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Expert opinion on the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C

Open access
Zeuzem, S., Berg, T., Moeller, B., Hinrichsen, H., Mauss, S., Wedemeyer, H., Sarrazin, C., Hueppe, D., Zehnter, E., Manns, M. P.·2009·Journal of Viral Hepatitis

Abstract

Summary. The current preferred treatment for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is combination therapy consisting of pegylated interferon alfa and ribavirin (RBV) for 24–48 weeks. Although this approach appears to be highly effective for patients with HCV genotypes 2 or 3, who have a sustained virological response (SVR) of approximately 80%, the treatment algorithm is less effective for patients with HCV genotype 1, as these patients have SVR rates of just 40–50%. In order to improve treatment outcomes, this article explores potential approaches for the optimization of treatment for patients with HCV genotype 1: considering shorter treatment periods for patients with a rapid virological response (RVR), increasing treatment periods for slow responders, and increasing RBV dose are all suggestions. Results from clinical trials suggest that approximately 20% of the HCV genotype 1‐infected population are slow responders, and around 15% of all HCV genotype‐1 infected patients could benefit from a shorter treatment duration without compromising the SVR rate. Interest has also focused on whether treatment duration could be individualized in some patients with genotype 2 and 3 infection. Here all the findings from recent studies are translated into practical advice, to help practitioners make evidence‐based treatment decisions in everyday clinical practice. Although there are areas where currently available data do not provide conclusive evidence to suggest amending treatment approaches, there is clearly potential for individualized treatment in all aspects of hepatitis treatment in the future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2008.01012.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 242

Metadata

Authors
Zeuzem, S., Berg, T., Moeller, B., Hinrichsen, H., Mauss, S., Wedemeyer, H., Sarrazin, C., Hueppe, D., Zehnter, E., & Manns, M. P.
Venue
Journal of Viral Hepatitis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-01-30
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
75-90
ISSN
  • 1352-0504 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2893
OpenAlex
W2026067734
Cited by
242
References
0
FWCI
17.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Expert opinion on the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2893.2008.01012.x
The paper
Zeuzem, S., Berg, T., Moeller, B., Hinrichsen, H., Mauss, S., Wedemeyer, H., Sarrazin, C., Hueppe, D., Zehnter, E., & Manns, M. P. (2009). Expert opinion on the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Journal of Viral Hepatitis. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2893.2008.01012.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.