The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The response of mammals to forest fire and timber harvest in the North American boreal forest
Abstract
1. This paper reviews and compares the effects of forest fire and timber harvest on mammalian abundance and diversity, throughout successional time in the boreal forest of North America. 2. Temporal trends in mammal abundance and diversity are generally similar for both harvested and burned stands, with some differences occurring in the initiation stage (0–10 years post disturbance). 3. Small mammals and ungulates are most abundant immediately post disturbance, and decrease as stands age. Lynxes and hares utilize mid‐successional stands, but are rare in young and old stands. Bats, arboreal sciurids and mustelids increase in abundance with stand age, and are most abundant in old growth. 4. Substantial gaps in the data exist for carnivores; the response of these species to fire and harvest requires research, as predator–prey interactions can affect mammal community structure in both early and late successional stages. 5. The lack of explicit treatment of in‐stand forest structure post disturbance, in the reviewed literature made comparisons difficult. Where forest structure was considered, the presence of downed woody material, live residual trees and standing dead wood were shown to facilitate convergence of mammal communities to a pre‐disturbance state for both disturbance types. 6. Mammalian assemblages differed considerably between successional stages, emphasizing the importance of maintaining stands of each successional stage on the landscape when implementing forest management strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Aspen, Elk, and Fire in Northern Yellowstone Park
Romme, W. H., Turner, M. G., Wallace, L. L., & Walker, J. S. (1995) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1941684 · Cited by 312
Marten Habitat Selection in a Clearcut Boreal Landscape
Potvin, F., Bélanger, L., & Lowell, K. (2000) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99036.x · Cited by 153
Winter distribution of woodland caribou in relation to clear-cut logging in west-central Alberta
Smith, K. G., Ficht, E. J., Hobson, D., Sorensen, T. C., & Hervieux, D. (2000) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z00-094 · Cited by 136
Day refuges of Peromyscus leucopus and Peromyscus maniculatus
Wolff, J. O., & Hurlbutt, B. (1982) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.2307/1380276 · Cited by 78 · cited 2×
“…infusion of DWM into the burn (or cutblock); DWM is an integral habitat component for many small mammal species (Tevis, 1956; Gunderson, 1959; Wolff & Hurlbutt, 1982; Monthey & Soutière, 1985; Wywialowski & Smith, 1988; Nordyke & Buskirk, 1991; Planz & Kirkland, 1992; Tallmon & Mills, 1994).”
BackgroundHabitat succession and rodent distribution
M'Closkey, R. T. (1975) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.2307/1379675 · Cited by 41 · cited 1×
“Populations of meadow voles (M’Closkey, 1975) decrease throughout this successional stage.”
Background
Cited by
Festa-Bianchet, M., Ray, J. C., Boutin, S., Côté, S. D., & Gunn, A. (2011) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z11-025 · Cited by 426
Fontaine, J. B., & Kennedy, P. L. (2012) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/12-0009.1 · Cited by 205
(2009) · Lincoln (University of Nebraska) · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- FISHER, J. T., & WILKINSON, L.
- Venue
- Mammal Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-81
- ISSN
- 0305-1838 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2907
- OpenAlex
- W2169705370
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 10.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The response of mammals to forest fire and timber harvest in the North American boreal forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2005.00053.x
- The paper
- FISHER, J. T., & WILKINSON, L. (2005). The response of mammals to forest fire and timber harvest in the North American boreal forest. Mammal Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2005.00053.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.