The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecological impact of beavers Castor fiber and Castor canadensis and their ability to modify ecosystems
Abstract
1 The genus Castor comprises two species: the Eurasian beaver Castor fiber, and the North American beaver Castor canadensis. Both species suffered from overexploitation, but have seen a revival since the 1920s due to increased protection and reintroduction programmes. Increases in the populations and distributions of species that are able to modify ecosystems have generated much scientific interest. Here we review the available literature concerning the possible ecological impact of beaver species in the Old and New World. 2 Beavers, being ecosystem engineers, are among the few species besides humans that can significantly change the geomorphology, and consequently the hydrological characteristics and biotic properties of the landscape. In so doing, beavers increase heterogeneity, and habitat and species diversity at the landscape scale. Beaver foraging also has a considerable impact on the course of ecological succession, species composition and structure of plant communities, making them a good example of ecologically dominant species (e.g. keystone species). 3 Nevertheless, the strength of beavers’ impact varies from site to site, depending on the geographical location, relief and the impounded habitat type. Consequently, they may not be significant controlling agents of the ecosystem in all parts of their distribution, but have strong interactions only under certain circumstances. We suggest that beavers can create important management opportunities in the Holarctic, and this review will help land managers determine the likely outcome of beaver activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vannote, R. L., Minshall, G. W., Cummins, K. W., Sedell, J. R., & Cushing, C. E. (1980) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f80-017 · Cited by 9,984
An ecosystem engineer, the beaver, increases species richness at the landscape scale
Wright, J. P., Jones, C. G., & Flecker, A. S. (2002) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-002-0929-1 · Cited by 674
Naiman, R. J., Elliott, S. R., Helfield, J. M., & O'Keefe, T. C. (1999) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1023/a:1003768102188 · Cited by 75
Cited by
Beaver: Nature's ecosystem engineers
Brazier, R. E., Puttock, A., Graham, H. A., Auster, R. E., Davies, K. H., & Brown, C. M. L. (2021) · WIREs Water · doi:10.1002/wat2.1494 · Cited by 268
Bats benefit from beavers: a facilitative link between aquatic and terrestrial food webs
Nummi, P., Kattainen, S., Ulander, P., & Hahtola, A. (2011) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-010-9986-7 · Cited by 70
Can large carnivores change streams via a trophic cascade?
Beschta, R. L., & Ripple, W. J. (2019) · Ecohydrology · doi:10.1002/eco.2048 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- ROSELL, F., BOZSÉR, O., COLLEN, P., & PARKER, H.
- Venue
- Mammal Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 248-276
- ISSN
- 0305-1838 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2907
- OpenAlex
- W2128417323
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecological impact of beavers Castor fiber and Castor canadensis and their ability to modify ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2005.00067.x
- The paper
- ROSELL, F., BOZSÉR, O., COLLEN, P., & PARKER, H. (2005). Ecological impact of beavers Castor fiber and Castor canadensis and their ability to modify ecosystems. Mammal Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2005.00067.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.