Cited by 262Animal Ecology and Behavior StudiesWildlife Ecology and ConservationRangeland and Wildlife Management

The impacts and management of foxes Vulpes vulpes in Australia: Impact and management of foxes in Australia

SAUNDERS, Glen R., GENTLE, Matthew N., DICKMAN, Christopher R.·2010·Mammal Review

Abstract

1 The successful introduction of the red fox Vulpes vulpes into Australia in the 1870s has had dramatic and deleterious impacts on both native fauna and agricultural production. Historical accounts detail how the arrival of foxes in many areas coincided with the local demise of native fauna. Recent analyses suggest that native fauna can be successfully reintroduced to their former ranges only if foxes have been controlled, and several replicated removal experiments have confirmed that foxes are the major agents of extirpation of native fauna. Predation is the primary cause of losses, but competition and transmission of disease may be important for some species. 2 In agricultural landscapes, fox predation on lambs can cause losses of 1–30%; variation is due to flock size, health and management, as well as differences in the timing and duration of lambing and the density of foxes. 3 Fox control measures include trapping, shooting, den fumigation and exclusion fencing; baiting using the toxin 1080 is the most commonly employed method. Depending on the baiting strategy, habitat and area covered, baiting can reduce fox activity by 50–97%. We review patterns of baiting in a large sheep-grazing region in central New South Wales, and propose guidelines to increase landholder awareness of baiting strategies, to concentrate and coordinate bait use, and to maximize the cost-effectiveness of baiting programs. 4 The variable reduction in fox density within the baited area, together with t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2907.2010.00159.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Urban foxes live at higher densities than rural counterparts.

    “Urban areas support surprisingly high densities of foxes. For example, there are up to sixteen individuals per km2 in Melbourne (Marks and Bloomfield 1999), compared to just 0.2 individuals per km2 in rural areas (Saunders, Gentle, and Dickman 2010).”

    From Red fox viromes in urban and rural landscapes (2020) · cites this paper as Saunders, Gentle, and Dickman 2010

  • Red foxes are broadly distributed across natural and forested landscapes as well as highly urbanised, human-dominated areas.

    “They are broadly distributed across natural and forested landscapes as well as highly urbanised, human dominated areas (Saunders, Gentle, and Dickman 2010; Bateman and Fleming 2012).”

    From Red fox viromes in urban and rural landscapes (2020) · cites this paper as Saunders, Gentle, and Dickman 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SAUNDERS, G. R., GENTLE, M. N., & DICKMAN, C. R.
Affiliations
University of Canberra (AU)
Corresponding author
  • SAUNDERS, Glen R.
  • GENTLE, Matthew N.
Venue
Mammal Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-04-12
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
181-211
ISSN
0305-1838 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105513050
Cited by
262
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
10.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mammal Review (publishedVersion)
  • University of Canberra Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries archive of scientific and research publications (Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
red fox, invasive species, predation, competition (biology), disease transmission, agricultural losses, fox control, aerial baiting, exclusion fencing, trapping, sheep grazing, recolonization, New South Wales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review