The impacts and management of foxes Vulpes vulpes in Australia: Impact and management of foxes in Australia
Abstract
1 The successful introduction of the red fox Vulpes vulpes into Australia in the 1870s has had dramatic and deleterious impacts on both native fauna and agricultural production. Historical accounts detail how the arrival of foxes in many areas coincided with the local demise of native fauna. Recent analyses suggest that native fauna can be successfully reintroduced to their former ranges only if foxes have been controlled, and several replicated removal experiments have confirmed that foxes are the major agents of extirpation of native fauna. Predation is the primary cause of losses, but competition and transmission of disease may be important for some species. 2 In agricultural landscapes, fox predation on lambs can cause losses of 1–30%; variation is due to flock size, health and management, as well as differences in the timing and duration of lambing and the density of foxes. 3 Fox control measures include trapping, shooting, den fumigation and exclusion fencing; baiting using the toxin 1080 is the most commonly employed method. Depending on the baiting strategy, habitat and area covered, baiting can reduce fox activity by 50–97%. We review patterns of baiting in a large sheep-grazing region in central New South Wales, and propose guidelines to increase landholder awareness of baiting strategies, to concentrate and coordinate bait use, and to maximize the cost-effectiveness of baiting programs. 4 The variable reduction in fox density within the baited area, together with t…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Urban foxes live at higher densities than rural counterparts.
“Urban areas support surprisingly high densities of foxes. For example, there are up to sixteen individuals per km2 in Melbourne (Marks and Bloomfield 1999), compared to just 0.2 individuals per km2 in rural areas (Saunders, Gentle, and Dickman 2010).”
From Red fox viromes in urban and rural landscapes (2020) · cites this paper as Saunders, Gentle, and Dickman 2010
Red foxes are broadly distributed across natural and forested landscapes as well as highly urbanised, human-dominated areas.
“They are broadly distributed across natural and forested landscapes as well as highly urbanised, human dominated areas (Saunders, Gentle, and Dickman 2010; Bateman and Fleming 2012).”
From Red fox viromes in urban and rural landscapes (2020) · cites this paper as Saunders, Gentle, and Dickman 2010
Cites
Johnson, C. N., Isaac, J. L., & Fisher, D. O. (2007) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3711 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fleming, P. A., Crawford, H. M., Stobo‐Wilson, A. M., Dawson, S. J., Dickman, C. R., Dundas, S. J., Gentle, M. N., Newsome, T. M., O’Connor, J., Palmer, R., et al. (2021) · Mammal Review · doi:10.1111/mam.12251 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Self-citationRed fox viromes in urban and rural landscapes
Campbell, S. J., Ashley, W., Gil-Fernandez, M., Newsome, T. M., Di Giallonardo, F., Ortiz-Baez, A. S., Mahar, J. E., Towerton, A. L., Gillings, M., Holmes, E. C., et al. (2020) · Virus Evolution · doi:10.1093/ve/veaa065 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
- Authors
- SAUNDERS, G. R., GENTLE, M. N., & DICKMAN, C. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Canberra (AU)
- Corresponding author
- SAUNDERS, Glen R.
- GENTLE, Matthew N.
- ORCID
- GENTLE, Matthew N.
- Venue
- Mammal Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-04-12
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 181-211
- ISSN
- 0305-1838 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105513050
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 10.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mammal Review (publishedVersion)
- University of Canberra Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries archive of scientific and research publications (Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Keywords
- red fox, invasive species, predation, competition (biology), disease transmission, agricultural losses, fox control, aerial baiting, exclusion fencing, trapping, sheep grazing, recolonization, New South Wales
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review