The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Identification of electrophysiologically‐active compounds for the malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae , in human sweat extracts
Abstract
Abstract. Human sweat samples were chemically fractionated into acid and non‐acid components. The most abundant volatile compounds present in the fractions were identified by linked gas chromatography mass spectrometry. The acid fractions were found to be composed of a range of twenty aliphatic and three aromatic carboxylic acids ranging, on average, from 0.02 to 20 ig per ml of sweat sampled. Non‐acid fractions were found to contain: 6‐methyl‐5‐hepten‐2‐one, l‐octen‐3‐ol, decanal, benzyl alcohol, dimethylsulphone, phenylethanol, phenol and 4‐mefhylphenol, collectively amounting to 0.1 and 3 |ig per ml of sweat. The major component of sweat was found to be L‐lactic acid which constituted from 1 to 5 mg/ml. Using the intact antennae of the anthropophilic malaria vector mosquito Anopheles gambiae Giles, the peripheral olfactory activities of compounds identified in the sweat fractions were investigated by electroantennography (EAG). Short‐chain saturated carboxylic acids, methanoic, ethanoic, propanoic, butanoic, pentanoic and hexanoic acids were found to elicit significantly larger EAG responses than longer chain saturated carboxylic acids from female An.gambiae. For a given dose the largest amplitude EAG response was elicited by methanoic acid. Pentanoic acid elicited larger EAG responses than either butanoic or hexanoic acids. Two non‐acidic compounds, l‐octen‐3‐ol and 4‐methylphenol, were found to elicit significant dose‐dependent EAG responses from female An.gambiae. 1 ‐Octen‐3‐ol elicited larger EAG responses than 4‐methylphenol for a given dose, but both compounds elicited smaller EAG responses than the same dose of C ] ‐C 6 straight‐chain aliphatic carboxylic acids. The possible behavioural significance of the EAG‐active compounds identified in human sweat samples is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evolution of mosquito preference for humans linked to an odorant receptor
McBride, C. S., Baier, F., Omondi, A. B., Spitzer, S. A., Lutomiah, J., Sang, R., Ignell, R., & Vosshall, L. B. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13964 · Cited by 585
Bernier, U. R., Kline, D. L., Barnard, D. R., Schreck, C. E., & Yost, R. A. (2000) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac990963k · Cited by 522
Molecular basis of odor coding in the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles gambiae
Wang, G., Carey, A. F., Carlson, J. R., & Zwiebel, L. J. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0913392107 · Cited by 386
Odor Coding in the Maxillary Palp of the Malaria Vector Mosquito Anopheles gambiae
Lu, T., Qiu, Y. T., Wang, G., Kwon, J. Y., Rutzler, M., Kwon, H.-W., Pitts, R. J., van Loon, J. J. A., Takken, W., Carlson, J. R., et al. (2007) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.062 · Cited by 371
Olfactory regulation of mosquito–host interactions
Zwiebel, L. J., & Takken, W. (2004) · Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2004.03.017 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- CORK, A., & PARK, K. C.
- Venue
- Medical and Veterinary Entomology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 269-276
- ISSN
- 0269-283X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2915
- OpenAlex
- W2083439204
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of electrophysiologically‐active compounds for the malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae , in human sweat extracts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2915.1996.tb00742.x
- The paper
- CORK, A., & PARK, K. C. (1996). Identification of electrophysiologically‐active compounds for the malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae , in human sweat extracts. Medical and Veterinary Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2915.1996.tb00742.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.