The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Shoo fly, don't bother me! Efficacy of traditional methods of protecting cattle from tsetse
Abstract
Studies were made of the efficacy of using smoke and housing to protect cattle from tsetse (Diptera: Glossinidae) in Zimbabwe. The efficacy of smoke was assessed by its effect on catches in Epsilon traps baited with a blend of acetone, 1-octen-3-ol, 4-methylphenol and 3-n-propylphenol. The efficacies of different types of kraal (enclosure) were gauged according to the catches of electrocuting targets (E-targets), baited with natural ox odour, placed within various designs of kraal. Smoke from burning wood (Colophospermum mopane) or dried cow dung reduced the catch of traps by approximately 50-90%. Kraals with a continuous wooden or netting wall, 1.5 m high, reduced catches of E-targets by approximately 75%. Arrangements of electric nets were used to assess the numbers of tsetse attacking live cattle within kraals and/or near sources of smoke. The results confirmed findings with traps and E-targets: kraals reduced the numbers of tsetse that fed by approximately 80% and smoke reduced the numbers attracted by approximately 70%; the use of both reduced overall attack rates by approximately 90%. The inclusion of 4-methylguaiacol, a known repellent for tsetse and a natural component of wood smoke, halved the catches of traps and E-targets and the numbers of tsetse attacking cattle. The practical benefits and difficulties of using repellents and/or housing to manage trypanosomiases are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The promising news is that there are several electrophysiological and behavioural assays with correspondingly robust analyses currently being used in vector biology research that could be incorporated into such schemes once adopted by WHOPES and the wider scientific community [16,36-42].”
From Spatial repellents: from discovery and development to evidence-based validation (2012) · cites this paper as [42]
Citations
The citation lists are queued
They are fetched later and appear here then.
References 32 · Cited by 33
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Marsden K., 1891, Riding through Siberia—A Mounted Medical Mission in 1891.
- Paton T., 1863, The ‘horse sickness' of the Cape of Good Hope., The Veterinarian, 36, 489
- Suarez M.M., 1968, Los Warao: Indigenas del delta Orinoco.
Metadata
- Authors
- TORR, S. J., MANGWIRO, T. N. C., & HALL, D. R.
- Affiliations
- Natural Resources Institute (GB)
- Zimbabwe Open University (ZW)
- Corresponding author
- TORR, S. J.
- Venue
- Medical and Veterinary Entomology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01-30
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 192-201
- ISSN
- 0269-283X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2915
- OpenAlex
- W1968179626
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical and Veterinary Entomology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- World Bank Group
- World Health Organization
- UNICEF
- Department for International Development
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Trypanosoma species research and implications
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect behavior and control techniques
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
- Keywords
- tsetse flies, cattle protection, wood smoke, 4-methylguaiacol, trypanosomiasis, traditional pest control, Zimbabwe
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Cattle, Cattle Diseases, Housing, Animal, Insect Control, Insect Repellents, Odorants, Organic Chemicals, Smoke, Trypanosomiasis, African, Trypanosomiasis, Bovine, Tsetse Flies, Zimbabwe
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shoo fly, don't bother me! Efficacy of traditional methods of protecting cattle from tsetse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2915.2010.00942.x
- The paper
- TORR, S. J., MANGWIRO, T. N. C., & HALL, D. R. (2011). Shoo fly, don't bother me! Efficacy of traditional methods of protecting cattle from tsetse. Medical and Veterinary Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2915.2010.00942.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.