Cited by 125Student Assessment and FeedbackInnovations in Medical EducationClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Undergraduate medical students: who seeks formative feedback?

Open access
Sinclair, Hazel K, Cleland, Jennifer A·2007·Medical Education

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to monitor which undergraduate students collected formative feedback on their degree essays and to quantify any correlations between gender or summative mark achieved and whether formative feedback was sought. Methods We carried out a study at the University of Aberdeen Medical School, involving a total of 360 Year 3 students, comprising all 177 students in the 2004 cohort and 183 in 2005. Data on gender and summative mark were routinely collected during the degree assessment processes in March 2004 and 2005. Students signed on receipt of their feedback. Results Less than half the students (46%) collected their formative feedback: 47% in 2004, and 45% in 2005. Overall, females were significantly more likely than males to seek formative feedback ( P = 0.004). Higher achievers were significantly more likely than lower achievers to seek their feedback ( P = 0.020). Conclusions Our findings indicate that these medical students, particularly males and poor students, may not use assessment feedback as a learning experience. Female and better students are keener to seek out formative feedback that might be expected to help them continue to do well. We need to explore further why so many students do not access formative feedback, and develop strategies for addressing this issue effectively.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02768.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Less than half of undergraduate medical students even chose to collect the feedback provided on their essays.

    “In one study, less than half of undergraduate medical students even chose to collect the feedback provided on their essays (Sinclair and Cleland, 2007).”

    From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Sinclair and Cleland, 2007

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Wood BP. Feedback: a key feature of medical training. Radiology 2000;215:17-9.
  2. Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA 1983;250 (6):777-81.
  3. Haq I, Ingham J, Morris R, Dacre J. Effect of ethnicity and gender on performance in undergraduate medical examinations. Med Educ 2005;39:1126-8.
  4. Chaput de Saintonge DM, Dunn DM. Gender and achievement in clinical medical students: a path analysis. Med Educ 2001;35:1024-33.
  5. Cleland J, Arnold R, Chesser A. Failing finals is often a surprise for the student but not the teacher: identifying difficulties and supporting students with academic difficulties. Med Teacher 2005;27(6):504-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sinclair, H. K., & Cleland, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Aberdeen (GB)
Corresponding author
Sinclair, Hazel K
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-05-18
Volume
41
Issue
6
Pages
580-582
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2021305481
Cited by
125
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
formative feedback, undergraduate medical students, feedback seeking, gender differences, student learning, medical education assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Educational Status, Feedback, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Personal Satisfaction, Scotland, Sex Factors, Students, Medical, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review