Undergraduate medical students: who seeks formative feedback?
Open accessAbstract
Objective This study aimed to monitor which undergraduate students collected formative feedback on their degree essays and to quantify any correlations between gender or summative mark achieved and whether formative feedback was sought. Methods We carried out a study at the University of Aberdeen Medical School, involving a total of 360 Year 3 students, comprising all 177 students in the 2004 cohort and 183 in 2005. Data on gender and summative mark were routinely collected during the degree assessment processes in March 2004 and 2005. Students signed on receipt of their feedback. Results Less than half the students (46%) collected their formative feedback: 47% in 2004, and 45% in 2005. Overall, females were significantly more likely than males to seek formative feedback ( P = 0.004). Higher achievers were significantly more likely than lower achievers to seek their feedback ( P = 0.020). Conclusions Our findings indicate that these medical students, particularly males and poor students, may not use assessment feedback as a learning experience. Female and better students are keener to seek out formative feedback that might be expected to help them continue to do well. We need to explore further why so many students do not access formative feedback, and develop strategies for addressing this issue effectively.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Less than half of undergraduate medical students even chose to collect the feedback provided on their essays.
“In one study, less than half of undergraduate medical students even chose to collect the feedback provided on their essays (Sinclair and Cleland, 2007).”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Sinclair and Cleland, 2007
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Wood BP. Feedback: a key feature of medical training. Radiology 2000;215:17-9.
- Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA 1983;250 (6):777-81.
- Haq I, Ingham J, Morris R, Dacre J. Effect of ethnicity and gender on performance in undergraduate medical examinations. Med Educ 2005;39:1126-8.
- Chaput de Saintonge DM, Dunn DM. Gender and achievement in clinical medical students: a path analysis. Med Educ 2001;35:1024-33.
- Cleland J, Arnold R, Chesser A. Failing finals is often a surprise for the student but not the teacher: identifying difficulties and supporting students with academic difficulties. Med Teacher 2005;27(6):504-8.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538 · Cited by 884 · see citing works
Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Rowntree, J., & Parker, M. (2017) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1130032 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education
Jonsson, A. (2013) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787412467125 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently)
Schinske, J., & Tanner, K. (2014) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.cbe-14-03-0054 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Mind the gap! Students’ use of exemplars and detailed rubrics as formative assessment
Lipnevich, A. A., McCallen, L. N., Miles, K. P., & Smith, J. K. (2014) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9299-9 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Insights Gained from the Analysis of Performance and Participation in Online Formative Assessment
Kibble, J. D., Johnson, T. R., Khalil, M. K., Nelson, L. D., Riggs, G. H., Borrero, J. L., & Payer, A. F. (2011) · Teaching and Learning in Medicine · doi:10.1080/10401334.2011.561687 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Grades in formative workplace‐based assessment: a study of what works for whom and why
Lefroy, J., Hawarden, A., Gay, S. P., McKinley, R. K., & Cleland, J. (2015) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12659 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Sinclair, H. K., & Cleland, J. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Sinclair, Hazel K
- ORCID
- Cleland, Jennifer A
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-05-18
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 580-582
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2923
- OpenAlex
- W2021305481
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 5.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Medical Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Keywords
- formative feedback, undergraduate medical students, feedback seeking, gender differences, student learning, medical education assessment
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Educational Status, Feedback, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Personal Satisfaction, Scotland, Sex Factors, Students, Medical, Cohort Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review