‘Paying it forward’: performance improvement through feedforward interviews
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Motivation is influenced by feedback.
“but it is no less important to learning, and is influenced by feedback [28, 34, 45].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [45]
Cites
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559 · see citing works
Williams, E. S., Manwell, L. B., Konrad, T. R., & Linzer, M. (2007) · Health Care Management Review · doi:10.1097/01.hmr.0000281626.28363.59 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
“I'll never play professional football” and other fallacies of self-assessment
Eva, K. W., & Regehr, G. (2008) · Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions · doi:10.1002/chp.150 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use
Sargeant, J., Mann, K., Sinclair, D., Van der Vleuten, C., & Metsemakers, J. (2008) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-006-9039-x · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Feedback, the various tasks of the doctor, and the feedforward alternative
Kluger, A. N., & Van Dijk, D. (2010) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03849.x · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Keroack, M. A., Youngberg, B. J., Cerese, J., et al. (2007) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e318159e1ff · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Doctors’ perceptions of why 360‐degree feedback does (not) work: a qualitative study
Overeem, K., Wollersheim, H. C. H., Driessen, E. W., Lombarts, K. M. J. M. H., van de Ven, G., Grol, R. P. T. M., & Arah, O. A. (2009) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03439.x · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Self-citationMitchell, M., Srinivasan, M., West, D. C., Franks, P. J., Keenan, C. R., Henderson, M. A., & Wilkes, M. S. (2005) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200504000-00016 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Making self-assessment more effective
Galbraith, R. M., Hawkins, R. E., & Holmboe, E. S. (2008) · Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions · doi:10.1002/chp.151 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Akre, V., Falkum, E., Hoftvedt, B. O., et al. (1997) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00178-5 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Peer mentoring in doctor performance assessment: strategies, obstacles and benefits
Overeem, K., Driessen, E. W., Arah, O. A., Lombarts, K. M. J. M. H., Wollersheim, H. C. H., & Grol, R. P. T. M. (2009) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03580.x · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationHealth Care Quality Information Liability and Privilege
Donohue, S. K. (2002) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education.
Lefroy, J., Watling, C., Teunissen, P. W., & Brand, P. (2015) · Perspectives on Medical Education · doi:10.1007/s40037-015-0231-7 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
- Authors
- Overeem, K.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Overeem, Karlijn
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-11-17
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1159-1161
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2923
- OpenAlex
- W1537435567
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
- Keywords
- performance improvement, feedback, medical students, reflective practice
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Models, Psychological, Medical Errors, Feedback, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
