Cited by 865Empathy and Medical EducationInnovations in Medical EducationHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An empirical study of decline in empathy in medical school

Abstract

Context It has been reported that medical students become more cynical as they progress through medical school. This can lead to a decline in empathy. Empirical research to address this issue is scarce because the definition of empathy lacks clarity, and a tool to measure empathy specifically in medical students and doctors has been unavailable. Objective To examine changes in empathy among medical students as they progress through medical school. Materials and subjects A newly developed scale (Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy [JSPE], with 20 Likert‐type items) was administered to 125 medical students at the beginning (pretest) and end (post‐test) of Year 3 of medical school. This scale was specifically developed for measuring empathy in patient care situations and has acceptable psychometric properties. Methods In this prospective longitudinal study, the changes in pretest/post‐test empathy scores were examined by using t ‐test for repeated measure design; the effect size estimates were also calculated. Results Statistically significant declines were observed in 5 items ( P < 0.01) and the total sores of the JSPE ( P < 0.05) between the 2 test administrations. Conclusions Although the decline in empathy was not clinically important for all of the statistically significant findings, the downward trend suggests that empathy could be amenable to change during medical school. Further research is needed to identify factors that contribute to changes in empathy and to examine whether targeted educational programmes can help to retain, reinforce and cultivate empathy among medical students for improving clinical outcomes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01911.x

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. 10.1001/jama.1990.03440040066030 · DOI
  2. 10.1001/archinte.157.20.2291 · DOI
  3. Ludmerer KM, 1999, Time to Heal.
  4. 10.1037//0022-3514.44.1.113 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Hojat M, 2004, A visitor's guide to effect sizes: statistical versus practical (clinical) importance of research findings, Adv Health Sci Educ
  6. Alcorta‐G de GonzalezA HojatMet al.Empathy as a function of gender and levels of undergraduate and graduate medical education in Mexico. [Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) Bern Switzerland September2003.
  7. Feighny KM, 1998, In pursuit of empathy and its relationship to physician communication skills: multidimensional empathy training for medical students, Ann Behav Sci Med Educ, 5, 13
  8. Traux CB, 1967, Towards Effective Counseling and Psychotherapy.
  9. Markham B, 1979, Can a behavioural science course change medical students' attitudes?, J Psychiatric Educ, 3, 44
  10. Engel GL, 1990, A New Medical Model: a Challenge for Biomedicine?, 13

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 865

Metadata

Authors
Hojat, M., Mangione, S., Nasca, T. J., Rattner, S., Erdmann, J. B., Gonnella, J. S., & Magee, M.
Affiliations
  • Thomas Jefferson University (US)
  • Pfizer (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Hojat, Mohammadreza
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-08-24
Volume
38
Issue
9
Pages
934-941
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2102389247
Cited by
864
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 38
FWCI
6.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Keywords
empathy, medical students, Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy, empathy decline, psychometric validation, empathy education
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Educational Measurement, Empathy, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Prospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review