The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conditions for successful reflective use of portfolios in undergraduate medical education
Open accessAbstract
Aim Portfolios are often used as an instrument with which to stimulate students to reflect on their experiences. Research has shown that working with portfolios does not automatically stimulate reflection. In this study we addressed the question: What are the conditions for successful reflective use of portfolios in undergraduate medical education? Methodology/research design We designed a portfolio that was aimed at stimulating reflection in early undergraduate medical education, using experiences described in the medical education literature and elsewhere. Conditions for reflective portfolio use were identified through interviews with 13 teachers (mentors), who were experienced in mentoring students in the process of developing their portfolios. The interviews were analysed according to the principles of grounded theory. Results The conditions for successful reflective use of portfolios that emerged from the interviews fell into 4 categories: coaching; portfolio structure and guidelines; relevant experiences and materials, and summative assessment. According to the mentors, working with a portfolio designed to meet these conditions will stimulate students' reflective abilities. Conclusion This study shows that portfolios are a potentially valuable method of assessing and developing students' reflective skills in undergraduate medical training, provided certain conditions for effective portfolios are recognised and met. Portfolios have a strong potential for enhancing learning and assessment but they are very vulnerable and may easily lead to disappointment. Before implementing portfolios in education, one should first consider whether the necessary conditions can be fulfilled, including an appropriate portfolio structure, an appropriate assessment procedure, the provision of enough new experiences and materials, and sufficient teacher capacity for adequate coaching and assessment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
In search of the essence of a good teacher: towards a more holistic approach in teacher education
Korthagen, F. A. J. (2004) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2003.10.002 · Cited by 1,766
Cited by
Buckley, S., Coleman, J., Davison, I., Khan, K. S., Zamora, J., Malick, S., Morley, D., Pollard, D., Ashcroft, T., Popovic, C., et al. (2009) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590902889897 · Cited by 462
Medical Humanities and Their Discontents: Definitions, Critiques, and Implications
Shapiro, J., Coulehan, J., Wear, D., & Montello, M. (2009) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e3181938bca · Cited by 262
The use of programmatic assessment in the clinical workplace: A Maastricht case report
Driessen, E. W., van Tartwijk, J., Govaerts, M., Teunissen, P., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2012) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2012.652242 · Cited by 116
Self-citationMonitoring and regulation of learning in medical education: The need for predictive cues
de Bruin, A. B. H., Dunlosky, J., & Cavalcanti, R. B. (2017) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.13267 · Cited by 112
Heeneman, S., & de Grave, W. (2017) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2017.1286308 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Driessen, E. W., Van Tartwijk, J., Overeem, K., Vermunt, J. D., & Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M.
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-11-25
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1230-1235
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2923
- OpenAlex
- W2101333024
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 62.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conditions for successful reflective use of portfolios in undergraduate medical education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02337.x
- The paper
- Driessen, E. W., Van Tartwijk, J., Overeem, K., Vermunt, J. D., & Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2005). Conditions for successful reflective use of portfolios in undergraduate medical education. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02337.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.