Cited by 116Innovations in Medical EducationClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsStudent Assessment and Feedback

The use of programmatic assessment in the clinical workplace: A Maastricht case report

Driessen, Erik W., van Tartwijk, Jan, Govaerts, Marjan, Teunissen, Pim, van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.·2012·Medical Teacher

Abstract

The differences of learning experiences in the workplace put challenges on the assessment: the assessment programme should be aligned with the general competency framework of the curriculum and also fit to the differences in learning contexts of the workplace. We used van der Vleuten's programmatic assessment model to develop a workplace-based assessment programme for final year clerkships. We aimed to design a programme that stimulates learning, supports assessment decision, is feasible and non-bureaucratic. The first experiences with the programme show that students think that the programme has high learning value and the assessment is sufficiently robust. Many of the commonly reported weaknesses of work-based assessment (not a good fit with the educational context, too complex, too bureaucratic and too much work) were not mentioned by the students.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/0142159x.2012.652242

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Driessen, E. W., van Tartwijk, J., Govaerts, M., Teunissen, P., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Driessen, Erik W.
Venue
Medical Teacher
Published
2012-02-25
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
226-231
ISSN
  • 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-187X
OpenAlex
W2112821646
Cited by
116
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords
programmatic assessment, workplace-based assessment, medical education, competency framework, assessment design, student perceptions, assessment decision-making, Maastricht
MeSH terms
Clinical Clerkship, Educational Measurement, Humans, Netherlands, Students, Medical, Program Evaluation, Models, Educational, Models, Organizational, Problem-Based Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review