Cited by 47Medical Education and AdmissionsInnovations in Medical EducationAcademic integrity and plagiarism

The effect of defined violations of test security on admissions outcomes using multiple mini-interviews

Open access
Reiter, Harold I, Salvatori, Penny, Rosenfeld, Jack, Trinh, Kien, Eva, Kevin W·2006·Medical Education

Abstract

Introduction Heterogeneous results exist regarding the impact of security violations on student performances in objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs). Three separate studies investigate whether anticipated security violations result in undesirable enhancement of MMI performance ratings. Methods Study 1: low‐stakes: MMI station stems provided to a random half of 57 medical school applicants 2 weeks in advance of participation in a research study. Study 2: high‐stakes: 384 medical school applicants sat a 12‐station MMI to determine admission. Each half received 1 of 2 pilot MMI station stems 2 weeks in advance. Study 3: high‐stakes: 38 interviewees with dual applications to occupational therapy and physiotherapy experienced the same 7‐station MMI twice on the same date. Results No statistically significant differences in MMI performances were detected. Conclusions Predictable violations of MMI security do not unduly influence applicant performance ratings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02348.x

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]14. Colliver JA, Barrows HS, Vu NV, Verhulst SJ, Mast TA, Travis TA. Test security in examinations that use stan- dardized-patient cases. Acad Med 1991;66:279-82.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reiter, H. I., Salvatori, P., Rosenfeld, J., Trinh, K., & Eva, K. W.
Affiliations
McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Eva, Kevin W
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-12-21
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
36-42
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2140015094
Cited by
47
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Board of Medical Examiners
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
Keywords
multiple mini-interviews, test security, security breaches, medical school admissions, high-stakes testing, low-stakes assessment
MeSH terms
Interviews as Topic, Ontario, School Admission Criteria, Schools, Medical, Security Measures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review